A person in the military stationed in the US is not in any danger. A person deployed is in danger but not a death sentence, as you an others seem to think. It is far more likely that the person would die in a car accident driving to their base than being on their base.
A taxi driver is a dangerous job, but I would be proud of anybody who does it. It is a legal way to earn a living. Same for the military.
Maybe part of my confusion is that I didn't realize you were talking about only people who are stationed in the U.S. I suppose that wouldn't be a very dangerous career if one knew one was never going to see any conflict, not that one could know that.
I would think most people who are saying they be concerned for their children's safety are assuming their child would go to war. It's hard not to assume that given that in the last few years we've had conflicts in two different countries. I do, though, have a cousin who joined the army sometime after the Gulf war and never went to war; he's now out of the military and is a narcotics officer--surely more dangerous than anything he did in the military.
I think the issue isn't whether the military is more deserving of respect, but they are certainly not less deserving. People have stated they would look down on those in the military and wouldn't be proud. I can't understand that thought at all.
Why would someone hold an actor in higher regard than someone who protects them?
No, the military isn't a death sentence, but soldiers are willing to give their life for all of us. That does deserve a HUGE amount of respect.
The bolded part makes sense to me. I don't think that joining the military is a death sentence. I do think it is dangerous given what's currently going on. Hence I think it's completely normal that posters would be scared for their child's safety if their child joined--even if it was during peace time. Maybe if a kid joined Sweden's military or Switzerland's military there'd be little reason to be concerned about safety, but historically in the last 70some years we've had a military conflict in almost ever decade. I don't know how long different commitments to the military last, but it seems there is a pretty good chance that someone who'd be in the military for more than a few years might see war.
As for people looking down on a child who joined the military or not being proud for me there's an analogy to the cousin I mentioned earlier who is a narcotics officer. Now I assume he became an officer out of a desire to help people even at the expense of his own life, and that is, of course, commendable. Personally, though, I think the law's appraoch to drugs does a lot more damage than it does good. Obviously he didn't make the laws or procedures--the higher ups in the govt did that. But he has entered an insitution which--as it currently works--I feel is very problematic...especially knowing some of the tactics they use (given the stories he's told). This is not to say I am "against" narcotics officers or police officers in general--clearly, even if we had a better drug policy--some kind of legalization of some drugs--we'd still need cops and we'd still need cops who specialize in narcotics, though the philosophy and policies handed down to them from the govt would likely be very different. Rather, I'm against the overarching philosophy and policies which the government hands to narcotics officers. So I wouldn't necessarily be happy if my child decided to take part in it. That doesn't mean I would stop loving them or look down on them or wish they had been an actor (does any parent ever want that?

). Maybe by discussing our different views we could come to a common ground or maybe we'd just have to agree to disagree. And of course, I would be proud that my child wanted to help others and was willing to sacrafice him/herself if necessary.
I think maybe I see it this way because it is kind of the situation in my own family (which is large and Italian and big mouthed and they say what they are thinking). I'm half way through a 6 year PhD program, and yet every time I see my grandfather he asks, "can't you just change your major to law and be a lawyer?"

. I know he's proud of my academic accomplishments but my field is not what he would have picked for me. Similarly, I've always been outspokenly pro-choice while a close cousin is outspokenly pro-life. When I was a teenager we used to have very loud arguments about this. I'm sure that my cousin was not proud of my being pro-choice or my giving money to organizations that provide abortions or going to abortion rights marches. She has said, however, that she admires (and probably is proud of) my dedication and my passion about rights and freedom, though she and I disagree about what rights and freedoms we should in fact have. Finally in college I produced and directed a version of "The ****** Monologues" two different years; we put on the play in order to raise money for charities which help victims of domestic and sexual violence. My aunt and my grandmother refused to come see the play because they heard it was graphic and sexual and used a lot of curse words for body parts and they wanted no part of that. Surely they were proud of me for wanting to help violence victims, but just as surely they disagreed with, and hence were not proud of, our method of trying to help (by putting on an obscene play) and our philosophy (of openly celebrating female sexuality). I'm also gay and have a same-sex partner. I don't think anyone is proud of me for this--nobody's shouting it from the rooftops that I can tell. In fact, deep down they might very well be disappointed about it. But they are totally accepting and supportive about it and they love me unconditionally. I don't really know that some further sense of pride is necessary. Sure it'd be great if they were all feminist, and sex-positive, and pro-choice, and thought being gay was wonderful; but they aren't and I don't expect them to be proud of my doing things that go against their values.