Actually Continental's flights to Hawaii are rated quite well.
Not THIS one apparently!
Actually Continental's flights to Hawaii are rated quite well.
The situation was different because the pilot made a bad judgement error plain and simple. Maybe the girl DID have allergies. Maybe not.....we don't know except what we've been told. I still say he overreacted and I hope her family and the chaperone get compensated for it!
Just for argument sake, why did the pilot make a bad judgement? He erred on the side of caution for both the girl and the other 100+ passengers on the plane. It is his right and responsibility as a representative of the airline and captain of the plane to make that judgement call based on the best information he had at the time.
Kudos to him for doing what he did. If he had allowed her to fly and she died on the plane, everyone would be here screaming "What was that foolish pilot thinking allowing a sick passenger to fly over the ocean for 5 hours."![]()
Seems like the pilot had a lose/lose situation.
You can get a direct flight from EWR to Hawaii as well as several other Pacific Rim areas.
Anne
Not THIS one apparently!
I will rate it well. Any airline that considers their other passengers in contrast to a hacking, coughing teen gets an A in my book.
He wasn't in a lose/lose situation. He chose where he was in the situation when he CHOSE not to listen to a doctor. If he had listened to an artist then he'd be in a lose/ lose....but he ignored a medical professional. To me he CHOSE to be in this situation when he chose his own diagnosis over a medical doctor.
Then kudos to you both!![]()
The pilot is responsible for the aircraft, not a medical doctor who happened to listen to her lungs. The medical doctor wasn't the "airline's physician" he wasn't the passenger's physician, he just happened to be there and when push comes to shove, he won't be anywher to be found. The pilot would be the one "holding the yoke".
Bottom line? I wouldn't sit beside a dead body and I wouldn't want to sit beside a hacking passengers.
Well I don't WANT to sit beside either of them but I'd take hacking over dead any day. And what airline lets YOU choose who/what you get to sit by? Cause whomever it is let me at them...........there are SEVERAL people I don't want to sit by EVER!
Honestly, I don't see that as a valid comparison. A pilot is in charge of the plane. The doctor could not fly the plane. Really, it makes no sense.
I guess the best thing to do is to realize some people agree with the pilot's decision and some people don't.![]()
Actually Southwest doesn't have assigned seating. You can sit next to anyone you want!![]()
Bottom line? I wouldn't sit beside a dead body and I wouldn't want to sit beside a hacking passengers.
Do you know for sure that he wasn't an airline physician? I mean was it published and I missed it? I read a doc deemed her ok to fly and the pilot said tough she's off. I have NO idea if he worked with the airline, the airport or was just an average joe....point is HE has a medical degree the pilot not so much!
I see docs all the time that aren't MY physician so that theory in MY OPINION is discounted! Who cares if he wasn't her real doctor...point is he WENT to med school to be a doc right? He can't just do one of those "train at home" programs therefore he knows MORE than an average pilot or not? I mean come on! How do you know when push came to shove he wouldn't be anywhere around?????? Oh yeah you don't nor do I. I still say the medical diagnosis by a doctor SHOULD circumvent a pilot.
You say Po Tay Toe I say Po TAH ta....either way whatever!