Suzanne74
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- May 28, 2004
- Messages
- 2,933
You were suggesting by this post that the mom with twins was somehow more deserving of the double strollers. Which is silly.
We are not going to change anyone's mind on who should and shouldn't have a stroller. And quite frankly the only thing I am coming away with it is a desire to hit someone with mine, should I see them shooting me looks for having one. Toodles!
No I said it is a shame IF a single mom with twins park hopped and was not able to get a stroller because so many families with just one kid rent the double. The price increases could possibly decrease those that do this and allow more available to families with multiple young kids who want to park hop during the afternoon/night. That is all. I won't comment on the rest of your reply because it doesn't relate to topic.
Yes, strollers are "first come first serve", as are seats on the bus. But once you're on the bus and in a seat, if someone comes on who is more in need of a seat than I am (an elderly person, a mom with a baby, etc , I can get up and give them my seat, as can my children. Not so with strollers. When our kids got old enough to no need strollers (but would say they wanted one, at age 7 or 8) I'd explain that since we didn't need them, we'd leave them for the people who do and explain what it would be like for someone with smaller kids (reminding them how they used to be) if they got to the park and none where left. Granted, we almost always travel in busy times of year so this could really happen.
I'm sure most people here feel the same but I think we all must acceptt that there are people who don't.
well said
