Imzadi
♥ Saved by an angel in a trench coat!
- Joined
- Oct 29, 2004
- Messages
- 40,079
I agree that times up means that time is up. However, we don't know how much time it took to present the meals to the judges. If the last person to go served a cold dish, the judges would have come down on that chef. They need to be able to keep their dishes hot without abiding by the times up rule.
There is a difference in keeping a dish hot and still cooking it. (Wasn't it) Marcel who threw a fit because his stuff was half plated and ready to go, and they went with someone else instead?
Whereas, Jamie even said a couple time her beans weren't ready. That's cooking.
I still consider Jamie one of the best chefs there. Sure, she let the rules work to her advantage, but in a team challenge, if the team doesn't force the issue, I just don't put the sole blame on her. A true Top Chef would force the issue instead of just bowing down. And we will never really know if Jamie's dish was the worst -- in the past she has been hard on her own food. And complaining about things afterwards just made a couple of the chefs look petty. Spike blamed everyone, but himself, for what was a bad dish. Someone from the other team didn't compete and got a free pass, yet I haven't heard a lot of mention of that. As Tom C. himself said: "But the rest of the team should have said to her, “Jamie, that was the decision. You’re going out.” And when we called for them to say whose dish was up first, they should simply have called back, “Jamie’s.” End of story. She would have had to abide by the group’s decision … and perhaps the results would have been different. But the team didn’t do that, and they have to reconcile themselves to their role in that."
Yes, they should have had her go or forfeit the point for refusing to present anything, and she would have been one of the losers anyway.