And there lies the crux of the issue. I was going to respond a bunch more to you. .. and I still might.
But who gets to define what is "appropriate"
I have read the cases as far as the constitutionality of this. Even though the justices have so far upheld the school districts positions. . .
they warn that the idea of "service hours" must be defined by the students.
Soooooo. . .let's just say that I'm a member of the Westboro Baptist Church. My children have the right to define their service to the community as protesting gay soldiers' funerals. That is how they define "community service." Are you ok with that? Because if you are going to require it. . it counts. Schools do not get to push whatever their agenda is regarding what constitutes community service and how that plays out values wise. I'm Catholic and if my kids are attending a public HS, they get to count praying outside of abortion clinics with a group of nuns as their "service" to their community. It's such a fuzzy line that I think it needs to be dropped entirely.
It borders on Nazi youth. We mandate that you must "volunteer" in your community for the greater good of society. I hate to break it to you, but our system is based on the rights of the individual. Who gets to define "the greater good of society" And isn't now also our responsibility, to teach our youth, in a democratic society, to question authority and the scope of government? It's all so Orwellian. . ."mandatory volunteering." If that isn't doublespeak, I don't know what is.
Schools that have successfully implemented this "required" community service have counted sports and band/choir participation as counting. Constitutionally, they don't have a choice. If you play high school football, and people show up that are members of the community. . .than that constitutes "community service." If that doesn't fall under your definition, tough beans!
I know I read up thread some sorry soul that thinks a basic education isn't a "right." Well, every state in the union provides for that in their constitution. Here is my states:
It is [the]the paramount duty of the state to make ample provision for the education of all children[/B] residing within its borders, without distinction or preference on account of race, color, caste, or sex.
Here's another interesting tidbit:
All schools maintained or supported wholly or in part by the public funds shall be forever free from sectarian control or influence.
And:
Sectarianism may be the expression of a group's nationalistic or cultural ambitions
Sooo. . just because people of a certain persuasion think that "community service" is a good thing. . .they don't get to push that on others in order for those "others" to exercise their basic rights. You don't get to decide just because you think it has value, that others must find value in it. And even if we can all agree that there is value, you don't get to tell me that picking up trash is appropriate, but praying the Rosary is not, when it comes to "greater good."
I don't really know how else to make that clear! Just because some people think it a wonderful value to instill in people, doesn't mean they get to. And they certainly don't get to decide how others define action for the benefit of society.
How about mandatory military "volunteerism" as a prerequisite to a basic right. . like voting? All the arguments in the world about the value of military service isn't going to justify making it a requirement to a basic right. . .God given as we define them! And it really doesn't matter all the valuable things anybody wants to postulate about "service hours." It doesn't matter! You are simply not allowed to use the right to a basic education to impose your values on others. It's just not right on principle. There I said it!