They don’t have defacto laws in America?
It can vary widely state to state.
They don’t have defacto laws in America?
I read it to DH tonight, too, and he felt the same way - shrugged his shoulders and couldn't see the problem. We're together 37 years and happily married as well.I just read the OP’s post to my husband of twenty-five years (happily married, not bitter and no “bad experiences”) and we are in agreement in our response: spend your bonus on yourself and don’t look back.
Hello - husband and I have been married for 20 plus years and have separate checking accounts.
We have completely different areas in which we spend money - I like couture clothing, handbags, and concerts (average one a week). He likes cars and dope. Our marriage works for us.
I pay the mortgage, taxes, household expenses etc and am happy to do so. I love living in downtown Chicago even though it is expensive, and I make almost triple what DH makes.
He pays for his car and insurance. So DH has lots of discretionary income to enjoy his hobbies.
So this year with my bonus, I am intending to spend all of it on plastic surgery for myself. I am turning 50 next year and want a little tuneup.
Well DH flipped out - and decided he wanted some cash and got pissed I "won't share". In years past, I have used the bonus towards household improvements, or a trip for us.
This year I don't need to do that - my employer is gifting me $10,000 towards a vacation to celebrate my 50th.
I know I am being selfish a bit, but this is something I have wanted to do for years.
For the record, my bonus is $25,000 and I have offered my DH $2,000 for him to do what he wants.
I have NEVER been one to say this is my money and you cant have any - because we are a team.
Except for this year.
So - what say you? Let me have it! I won't say you are picking on me - looking for the other side here. My friends support what I am doing - but is there something I am missing??
Well said. I couldn't agree more.I find the idea that your career is yours alone to be rather narrowly sighted. My career depends on the fact that early in our marriage my wife supported me as I continued in school to get a second degree. I make the money I make right now because of my change of vocation. That wouldn't have happened without my wife's support.
At the same time, my wife is a teacher with very little room for time off. When the kids were sick, I worked from home or took the day off. When she went for her master's degree, I took care of the household, fed the children, etc. When I had training for my job 90 minutes away, my wife made sure the children had dinner and were taken to their practices and laundry was done while I was gone 12 hours a day.
So, to me, the idea of mine vs yours only works when you come into a relationship fully formed and don't have children. Either that, or you're both rich enough to hire a nanny and maid. If one spouse makes 3x amount the other does, but travels for work, the other partner picks up the slack at home. People in marriages succeed at their job because they sacrifice for each other. That, to me, is why you have one bank account and one budget. That's why the $25,000 bonus is our money. My spouse doesn't sit at my desk and do my job for me, but I wouldn't be where I am if she wasn't a partner in our relationship. Otherwise, we're just two people living in the same house with only our own responsibilities.
I'm not saying how other people work their finances is wrong. This was just my vision of what a marriage is.
Well said. I couldn't agree more.
Even if her household expenses are 10X his car expenses, that’s no guarantee he’s left with as much discretionary income as she has.
It's hardly rigidity. And it would obviously be discussed before marriage so both people are on the same page. Very odd that you think a dual income household is so rigid.
I think when you take children out of the equation the math looks very different. I don't have and don't want kids for instance, so the variables and the incredible expense of raising child is just gone. The OP doesn't have kids so the decision tree is much straighter.
I think when you take children out of the equation the math looks very different. I don't have and don't want kids for instance, so the variables and the incredible expense of raising child is just gone. The OP doesn't have kids so the decision tree is much straighter.
Ostensibly. But life isn't linear, nor is it always able to be thoroughly mapped out. Economic downturns and job loss; health issues, including chronic and catastrophic ones; and natural disasters wiping out home and possessions come to those with and without children alike. It's very empowering to face whatever life throws at me with a spouse who understands the greatest value of our partnership appears nowhere on a balance sheet and can't be bought at any price.
This is true. OP never actually mentioned children, so we’re presuming there are none. I’d guess the majority of posters here are parents. Around the age of 50 is when many of us are dealing with college tuition, a huge factor in family finances.
They're even expensive when you don't pay elementary school tuition.For what a vast majority of my friends with kids pay for their kids elementary per year, she could have this surgery plus a couple more...lol. Kids are expensive!
They're even expensive when you don't pay elementary school tuition.
Don't disagree and I think I've said that. The decision tree gets less complicated though. Some of this discussion has been muddied because people keep bringing kids into the equation and the "what about SAH parents," etc. The kids issue just isn't in place here. It wouldn't be in my life. One of the best parts of being in a partnership is knowing that someone has your back if the poop hits the fan, but some people don't hang when the going get rough, and right now we're discussing a basic question of should the OP be able to do something nice for herself. I think emphatically yes.
I still want to know what the OP is having done!
For anyone saying she should just go for it...... would your answer be the same if the husband had the big bonus and wanted to spend it on a boat or something only he wanted?
We will soon be hitting 40 years, 38 were spent with separate checking. Its a marriage saver. My wife took some of her inherited money and got some 'work' done and was very happy with it. I play the stock market and enjoy that. Its not 50/50 with expenses, we divide it up based on income. I pay for the big items like vacations and she always says thank you very much. She likes expensive hair cuts and I say she looks great, not how much did that cost. Works for us
PS - did anyone else have to google "dope?" I assumed it meant heroin, but apparently it can mean either heroin or marijuana. If OP lives where pot is legal maybe that's why she felt comfortable mentioning it.