- Joined
- Apr 29, 2004
- Messages
- 38,092
Very good point. DVC is designed for essentially 100% occupancy all year.Demand for cash rooms ebbs and flows a lot more than demand for DVC does.
Very good point. DVC is designed for essentially 100% occupancy all year.Demand for cash rooms ebbs and flows a lot more than demand for DVC does.
And that's on the usage side. On the purchasing side, people with $50,000 for a timeshare purchase are less vulnerable to economic fluctuations than people with $5,000 for a cash stay.Very good point. DVC is designed for essentially 100% occupancy all year.
Very good point. DVC is designed for essentially 100% occupancy all year.
Which theoretically means they now have fewer GF and Poly rooms that they have to worry about filling under the regular hotel room category. Lower supply, means potentially higher prices (or fewer discounts needed). Meanwhile, they’ve collected the original purchase on the converted DVC “rooms,” are collecting dues, and have less housekeeping requirements.And that's on the usage side. On the purchasing side, people with $50,000 for a timeshare purchase are less vulnerable to economic fluctuations than people with $5,000 for a cash stay.
Well balanced assessmentI just spent a few hours reading the last several years of DIS annual reports. I do still think DIS can return to better growth and profitability if they can continue to create magical stories and experiences. But in general their multiple was just too high and that’s probably the biggest reason we have seen the stock fall - IMO when it was at its highs, it was too high. And that was just an effect of what the stock market really is, which is about what people are willing to pay to buy a stock at the time and not a totally accurate reflection of its fundamentals. That’s just my opinion. On the other hand, some might look at Disney now and wonder if it’s a good value play at this point. I think it’s undervalued for the long term, but if you need returns in the short term, or are looking for dividends it’s probably not the right time. Inflation and a possible recession could impact their recovery as well.
10) “long wait times” and “feels crowded” and “park reservation availability” and “resort availability” does not necessarily correlate to high attendance. I wish we could see actual attendance figures. Wait times and room availability can be affected by supply availability, park pass manipulation, etc.
We've only been to a few TS restaurants in the last few months and only at Epcot. Both were full, as in no empty tables, but they didn't feel overly crowded, maybe they still have some tables removed? We have mostly gone to Epcot for the festival food and to try Connections, which was very good for QS.Have you noticed if the restaurants are all back to full capacity yet? One thing I noticed when we were there at thanksgiving (when park passes were unavailable and ADRs hard to come by), is that the restaurants were still not full capacity at all. Food and beverage has been one of the hardest labor shortages to fix (DH has direct experience with this through his work), and if they aren’t able to fill sit down restaurants because they can’t, then people are walking around instead, making it feel crowded. Plus think about the impact G+ can have on touring strategy. We used to be leave at 1pm and return at night people. But with G+, we found ourselves sometimes having to stay all day due to return times. That’s more people in the parks for more hours than in the past, but not necessarily higher attendance in terms of ticket revenue.
And I do think they could be limiting hotel capacity still, because they have to staff them to fill them. I noticed they report this figure sometimes in their annual report. I’ll be looking for it for this year for sure. Fascinating.
We went back last Oct, and noticed what you are saying about the seating at restaurants, and i would add on top of that, that the meals were all lack luster.Have you noticed if the restaurants are all back to full capacity yet? One thing I noticed when we were there at thanksgiving (when park passes were unavailable and ADRs hard to come by), is that the restaurants were still not full capacity at all. Food and beverage has been one of the hardest labor shortages to fix (DH has direct experience with this through his work), and if they aren’t able to fill sit down restaurants because they can’t, then people are walking around instead, making it feel crowded. Plus think about the impact G+ can have on touring strategy. We used to be leave at 1pm and return at night people. But with G+, we found ourselves sometimes having to stay all day due to return times. That’s more people in the parks for more hours than in the past, but not necessarily higher attendance in terms of ticket revenue.
And I do think they could be limiting hotel capacity still, because they have to staff them to fill them. I noticed they report this figure sometimes in their annual report. I’ll be looking for it for this year for sure. Fascinating.
Yeah, that's definitely a fair point. I think on top of it, it's i win win for Disney, because if they don't fill all DVC resorts with members on any given year, they can rent those rooms out to regular guests. I'm not versed on this so please correct me if i'm wrong, but since DVC members pay for all the upkeep in their Dues, Disney essentially gets to profit off the backs of their memebersI think you're circling the right ideas but piecing them together wrong. Demand for cash rooms ebbs and flows a lot more than demand for DVC does.
Most people who talk about "slashing capex" have no idea how much cruise ships cost.I hope the D+ numbers are good cause I have heard from some people that they plan to slash cap ex a lot.
Disney lately seems so focused on recouping the shutdown losses over trying to keep guests satisfied.
I wasn't talking about cruise ships. It's the capex for the parks that's getting slashed.Most people who talk about "slashing capex" have no idea how much cruise ships cost.
Parks capex includes cruise ships.I wasn't talking about cruise ships. It's the capex for the parks that's getting slashed.
Then I guess they aren't slashing anything. They are going to spend spend spend.Parks capex includes cruise ships.
I would say that in general Disney doesn't typically cut costs, they are constantly adding on pretty much everywhere. The pandemic seems to be the only thing in recent memory that i can come up with when it comes to cutting costs back, and the pandemic basically tied their hands on that. I have seen them delay projects in the past, but not outright cut back on things they were already offering, again the pandemic being the exceptionThen I guess they aren't slashing anything. They are going to spend spend spend.