You're not wrong. But if they had availability the morning of every day, they wouldn't need a reservation system at all. And I am not saying they need such a system, but to me it appears that they are managing to a different (lower) occupancy number than the fire marshal max capacity. I'm not sure how they fix this staffing issue given that Universal is opening a third gate in a few years (among other things like Poly2). I just expect my dues to go up to cover higher labor costs.Which doesn't make me feel any better. Parks being routinely unavailable does not lead to the feeling that WDW remains the most magical place on earth.
I guess the question is whether Touring Plans' 5/10 prediction is accurate. Right now, every attraction seems to be trending above their predicted wait time. Rise being down doesn't help, but it must have come back up shortly after you looked. Listed as 105 minute wait as of 5:32.Right now, random Monday at 5:30, ROTR is down. Millenium Falcon is at 115 minutes and Slinky Dog at 90. And that's a Touring Plans 5/10 crowd level.
Maybe they need to hire the Universal brain trust as they've seemingly figured it out if they're opening a third gate. Right?You're not wrong. But if they had availability the morning of every day, they wouldn't need a reservation system at all. And I am not saying they need such a system, but to me it appears that they are managing to a different (lower) occupancy number than the fire marshal max capacity. I'm not sure how they fix this staffing issue given that Universal is opening a third gate in a few years (among other things like Poly2). I just expect my dues to go up to cover higher labor costs.
You're not wrong. But if they had availability the morning of every day, they wouldn't need a reservation system at all. And I am not saying they need such a system, but to me it appears that they are managing to a different (lower) occupancy number than the fire marshal max capacity. I'm not sure how they fix this staffing issue given that Universal is opening a third gate in a few years (among other things like Poly2). I just expect my dues to go up to cover higher labor costs.
Having 0 of the 4 parks available is exceedingly rare. Others may know for certain, but I'm not sure it's happened since the Covid social distancing requirements were lifted.Fly in Sunday (fly out next Sunday) and have 5 parks reserved for Mon-Fri. Staying at CBR for 7 nights. On Wed one of the kids lightly twisted their ankle, weather report says basically monsoon all day Thursday. You’d LOVE to cancel Thursday and visit a park Saturday instead. Nope! There’s no availability, even though date priced tickets covers the dates in question and the whole trip is onsite booked thru Disney.
Or Universal simply doesn't draw the same crowds as Disney. In 2019 (pre-covid), all 4 WDW parks out-drew both US and IOA. No idea if that's still holding true today.Maybe they need to hire the Universal brain trust as they've seemingly figured it out if they're opening a third gate. Right?![]()
Of course, they could just staff up and run the parks like they've done for decades, right?I completely understand the down side of Park Pass and sympathize with anyone impacted. But--perhaps this is the optimist in me--on some levels I applaud Disney not just tossing the gates open and allowing a near unlimited flow of guests on every single day. If I *DO* have a park pass for MK on July 19, I know that there aren't going to be 80,000 people in the park. Disney capped attendance at some level which corresponds to staffing. That seems preferable to the maximum fire Marshall limits another poster referenced.
I guess a Yearly Annual Pass will just have a different definition.
and price increase.
Well, wait times are an entirely different debate and not wholly dependent on the number of guests that walk thru a gate.But when we see RNR and TOT at 60+ minutes, Runaway Railway at 65, Slinky at 95 and Rise at 140, I'm hard pressed to think that Disney should do away with Park Pass and admit even more people into the park.
Well, a couple thoughts.Of course, they could just staff up and run the parks like they've done for decades, right?
This is a good point and I don’t doubt it’s part of their intention. But they’re also looking to manipulate and shift guests from high attendance parks to lower. In the example WDW already had all the info about these guests, along with aggregate data to increase its usefulness. The product suffers for what gain. Precision comes at the cost of flexibility.I completely understand the down side of Park Pass and sympathize with anyone impacted. But--perhaps this is the optimist in me--on some levels I applaud Disney not just tossing the gates open and allowing a near unlimited flow of guests on every single day.
We can agree to disagree on whether the reservation system is a good thing for guests, or not. I understand your points and perspective. I guess I'm just an old guy who misses the spontaneity and freedom of the 'good ol' days'.Well, a couple thoughts.
First, we don't know how much staffing has changed in comparison to prior years, nor the areas where it's changed. To my eyes, most attractions seem to be running at their maximum capacity. As soon as one coaster train pulls out of the station, another arrives. As soon as one group departs their Dumbo elephants, another takes their place. Omnimovers keep...moving. Perhaps they are able to make some tweaks around things like Star Tours (fewer gates) or Jungle Cruise (fewer boats). But those are the exceptions.
If Disney is able to tweak any staffing based upon crowds, I suspect it happens more on under-utilized days when they can cut food service, retail and support workers.
Without park pass, we would simply see even larger crowds at MK and DHS. With longer wait times. THAT is what Disney did in the past--they threw the gates open with little regard for how long everyone had to wait.
What Park Pass does is it nudges people to the underutilized parks.
Without Park Pass, today's waits for RNR, Rise, Splash, Space and a dozen others would be even longer. No question. More people in the park = longer waits.
If that's what Disney wants, then they should just sell passes that flat out say you'll get half as many MK and HS days as AK and EPCOT days. If someone is OK with that, they get a cheaper pass. If not, you pay more, and your access to MK and AK is not throttled.This is a good point and I don’t doubt it’s part of their intention. But they’re also looking to manipulate and shift guests from high attendance parks to lower. In the example WDW already had all the info about these guests, along with aggregate data to increase its usefulness. The product suffers for what gain. Precision comes at the cost of flexibility.
I'm not disagreeing with the loss in flexibility. But really, between FP+ and dining reservations, how much flexibility did we really have?This is a good point and I don’t doubt it’s part of their intention. But they’re also looking to manipulate and shift guests from high attendance parks to lower. In the example WDW already had all the info about these guests, along with aggregate data to increase its usefulness. The product suffers for what gain. Precision comes at the cost of flexibility.
I think a lot of it has to do with the park's actual capacity. For example, Universal Studios Florida (not counting Islands, just the Studios park) has higher attendance numbers than Epcot and HS and does not have nearly as high wait times as HS. The highest wait times are Gringotts, Minions and Rip Ride Rocket. I would argue that this park suffers the same issue as HS in that it needs more rides (and also has VERY narrow walkways) and yet it's wait times are not nearly as bad.Well, wait times are an entirely different debate and not wholly dependent on the number of guests that walk thru a gate.
I think a lot of it has to do with the park's actual capacity. For example, Universal Studios Florida (not counting Islands, just the Studios park) has higher attendance numbers than Epcot and HS and does not have nearly as high wait times as HS. The highest wait times are Gringotts, Minions and Rip Ride Rocket. I would argue that this park suffers the same issue as HS in that it needs more rides (and also has VERY narrow walkways) and yet it's wait times are not nearly as bad.
Genie+/Lighting Lane is a big part of the problem.I think a lot of it has to do with the park's actual capacity. For example, Universal Studios Florida (not counting Islands, just the Studios park) has higher attendance numbers than Epcot and HS and does not have nearly as high wait times as HS. The highest wait times are Gringotts, Minions and Rip Ride Rocket. I would argue that this park suffers the same issue as HS in that it needs more rides (and also has VERY narrow walkways) and yet it's wait times are not nearly as bad.