Maybe they spent their budget all on clothes that they thought that she would like/look cute in. Just because they aren't toys doesn't mean that she might not like them.
I haven't seen where you mentioned the puzzles before. Do they know that she enjoys inexpensive puzzles from the Dollar Store? An inexpensive puzzle may not have done too much damage to their budget after they purchased the "cute/trendy" clothes.
They do, it's a running joke that the smaller lesser expensive things always go over well sort of like how kids love to play with a large appliance boxes etc.
You do realize that gift giving is not an obligation and gift receiving is not a right?Is it just me or has something changed, but I have always felt that kids should get mostly toys for Christmas not clothes or hats etc...
My one SIL wanted to get my DD(5) Ugg boots this year and she would have except that I told her we have already taken care of her boots for this year so she asked what to get her and I said anything Barbie... she sent quite a few things directly from the store and explained that the gifts weren't wrapped, no problem. Good thing I said something because my other SIL (still my husband's side of the family) sent her gifts for my DD up to us with a family friend and since it was quite a few packages, I told DD she could open them. We won't be seeing his side of the family at all for Christmas and I figured that she would have a head start on playing with her new toys... well, she got all clothes and an ornament. My MIL also gave her an item of clothes, a holiday themed blanket for her bed (too small) and holiday cookie cutters. I was glad that she could at least open the Barbie things and have something to play with rather than fold and put away (especially since it was a special occasion that she could open them early.)
I know I have my issues with the in-laws and such but for a 5 year old, I thought this was a little ridiculous. I felt bad because she started to show the classic signs of "oh no, not more clothes" creeping out as she opened her gifts. Thankfully she will get her fair share of toys from my side this weekend.
Maybe I am focusing in on this too much but I would never buy a child over a year old clothes for Christmas unless it is my own child.
OK looking forward to seeing what others think..
OP - I have a question: Your daughter is 5 - have these relatives given her toys and only toys for her first 4 Christmases? I can see why you might be surprised in that case.
My DD's have always gotten always a mix of things- clothes, toys, books, experiences, sports equipment, art supplies. DD18 was the only grandchild on both sides and the only niece for 7 years - if everyone had just gotten her toys every year, I wouldn't have been able to walk through the living room in January!
I always pretty much know what everyone in the family is getting my girls for Christmas - I don't order anyone to purchase particular things, but I do try to coordinate things to make sure everyone has the opportunity to give a give with a little bit of "wow" and that no one gets all the hot gift ideas. I also try to suggest gifts to people fit their style of giving - like always suggesting a book title to the godmother who likes to give books. It also reduces the chances of them getting multiples of the same gift (like the year I got 3 wafflemakers!)
M.
Is it just me or has something changed, but I have always felt that kids should get mostly toys for Christmas not clothes or hats etc...
My one SIL wanted to get my DD(5) Ugg boots this year and she would have except that I told her we have already taken care of her boots for this year so she asked what to get her and I said anything Barbie... she sent quite a few things directly from the store and explained that the gifts weren't wrapped, no problem. Good thing I said something because my other SIL (still my husband's side of the family) sent her gifts for my DD up to us with a family friend and since it was quite a few packages, I told DD she could open them. We won't be seeing his side of the family at all for Christmas and I figured that she would have a head start on playing with her new toys... well, she got all clothes and an ornament. My MIL also gave her an item of clothes, a holiday themed blanket for her bed (too small) and holiday cookie cutters. I was glad that she could at least open the Barbie things and have something to play with rather than fold and put away (especially since it was a special occasion that she could open them early.)
I know I have my issues with the in-laws and such but for a 5 year old, I thought this was a little ridiculous. I felt bad because she started to show the classic signs of "oh no, not more clothes" creeping out as she opened her gifts. Thankfully she will get her fair share of toys from my side this weekend.
Maybe I am focusing in on this too much but I would never buy a child over a year old clothes for Christmas unless it is my own child.
OK looking forward to seeing what others think..
I will say this thread has me rethinking the gifts I bought my teenage nephews. I got them tshirts from our overseas travels. They don't get to travel a lot so I wanted something interesting for them to have. They also don't get a lot of new clothing & wear a lot of hand me downs. I guess I'll see what they say when we open gifts.
You do realize that gift giving is not an obligation and gift receiving is not a right?
I hope you did not paint yourself into a corner with your "venting."
If I ever got so much as a whisper of a hint that my DIL was ungraciously whining (or sorry, venting) about my and my side of the family's gift-giving abilities and stating that luckily "her" side of the family does it right (implying she was unlucky with my side of the family), she would have whined (vented) herself out of any future presents.
See that's just it, my counterpart, meaning the other DIL that married one of MIL's sons, not her daughter that is technically also my SIL, has made it crystal clear that the clothes she has recieved for births, birthday and holiday presents will "go to the Mexicans that mow our lawn if they are from Carters, Childrens Place or Walmart etc, they will never see the light of day on my children" So we have all sort of discussed how different all of our tastes are in clothes and also what we each prefer/can spend on clothes etc so that is also a part of why I would have thought that outfits and such would be avoided but matching disney pj's are still good for grandma to get. See there I go again with more in-law venting but really it had to be said.
See that's just it, my counterpart, meaning the other DIL that married one of MIL's sons, not her daughter that is technically also my SIL, has made it crystal clear that the clothes she has recieved for births, birthday and holiday presents will "go to the Mexicans that mow our lawn if they are from Carters, Childrens Place or Walmart etc, they will never see the light of day on my children" So we have all sort of discussed how different all of our tastes are in clothes and also what we each prefer/can spend on clothes etc so that is also a part of why I would have thought that outfits and such would be avoided but matching disney pj's are still good for grandma to get. See there I go again with more in-law venting but really it had to be said.
See that's just it, my counterpart, meaning the other DIL that married one of MIL's sons, not her daughter that is technically also my SIL, has made it crystal clear that the clothes she has recieved for births, birthday and holiday presents will "go to the Mexicans that mow our lawn if they are from Carters, Childrens Place or Walmart etc, they will never see the light of day on my children" So we have all sort of discussed how different all of our tastes are in clothes and also what we each prefer/can spend on clothes etc so that is also a part of why I would have thought that outfits and such would be avoided but matching disney pj's are still good for grandma to get. See there I go again with more in-law venting but really it had to be said.
See that's just it, my counterpart, meaning the other DIL that married one of MIL's sons, not her daughter that is technically also my SIL, has made it crystal clear that the clothes she has recieved for births, birthday and holiday presents will "go to the Mexicans that mow our lawn if they are from Carters, Childrens Place or Walmart etc, they will never see the light of day on my children" So we have all sort of discussed how different all of our tastes are in clothes and also what we each prefer/can spend on clothes etc so that is also a part of why I would have thought that outfits and such would be avoided but matching disney pj's are still good for grandma to get. See there I go again with more in-law venting but really it had to be said.
Really??- even as a kid we opened them as they came. There was enough under the tree to open on Christmas that we didn't need to add the other gifts under there too. If my daughter gets a package in the mail she opens it as it comes-everyone else I know does it that way too! I never heard people actually put them under the tree for Christmas!
Exactly-if I am buying a gift its going to be something the person really wants-I don't buy a gift just to give something-if that is what someone is doing I would rather they not give at all. I think most kids would have the same reaction as OP's child and it is not because they are spoiled- Christmas is for fun gifts not clothes (unless they are asked for!)--I buy my daughter clothes all through the year as she needs them, they are not gifts-they are just part of raising a child! Geez do you people give underwear and bras as gifts to your kids too????
Seriously?![]()
Oh and you seem like such a peach... maybe you could write a parenting and etiquette book for folks like me who apparently need it ASAP.
Who would have thought that it was a unique and far fetched concept that children get, dare I say "toys" for Christmas.