I think the difference is that we consider our experience normal- we were not LUCKY not to have problems because the vast majority are not having problems. We don't say thank goodness we didn't have problems- we just assume it went normal- most people with this experience don't post on the message boards because they don't write things like - just back everything working as attended- when they do they quickly fall off the front page. Maybe we're wrong in that assumption but I know that's an assumption that I base most of my opinions on.
Because if iur experiences we see people who have problems as the unlucky exceptions, even if there are "many" of them. They are also much more likely to post on the message boards about their problems Because they are angry and frustrated (deservedly so in most cases) and then these posts are jumped on and other posters worry about if it might happen to them so the posts reach large post counts and stay on the front page for awhile.
It is impossible to know exactly what proportion of people are having problems, but when you haven't had problems even when you've put the system to rigorous use (three trips of varying sizes like pp said- I've done three trips entirely fp+ one of 6, one of 4 and one of 2, the last two were planned less than three weeks before arrival, no issues for me either. We also did two trips during testing when we had access to both legacy and fp+ and had no magic band or fp+ problems on those trips either) it's easy to assume that your experiences are the majority. I have no concerns about technical issues because I haven't had any significant issues with my trips. That doesn't mean we don't feel bad for the people who had problems or know that it could potentially happen to us too- we just default to our positive experiences.
I truly believe that the majority of guests are having glitch-free experiences. However, if you're the 1 person in 10,000 who is affected by a glitch then it doesn't matter that the other 10,000 had no problems.




