The Obama transition team, meanwhile, unveiled new rules yesterday on hiring lobbyists that are different than any previous administration's. But is this a change you can believe in?
Forgive the mocking of campaign rhetoric, but get used to it, because John Podesta's explanation yesterday of how 44 will and won't go about putting lobbyists on the team was an instructive first example of how Obama will reconcile his promises with reality, and how the press will cover it. Just looking at the headlines, maybe the new policy
"Restricts Lobbyists’ Role," (NYT) and
"Keep Its Distance From Lobbyists." (WaPo) Or perhaps
"Obama Softens Ban on Hiring Lobbyists," (Boston Globe) and is thus
"Looking More Like a Realist." (LAT)
Those lobbyist restrictions may also apply, in some form or another, to the Inauguration and associated festivities. But Obama et al haven't yet said how those rules will work, and it would be interesting to see whether there are enough non-lobbyist rich people out there who would be willing to pay thousands of dollars per ticket to sit at an Inaugural Ball, eat a bad dinner and wait for the Obamas to stop by for 5 minutes. That routine, at least, is unlikely to change.
Also unlikely to change, at least this week, is the Cabinet, as Obama's team doesn't plan to announce anyone until next week at the earliest, with most major names more likely to come in December. Bill Richardson is getting a boost for Secretary of State
courtesy of Latino advocacy groups, who pointedly note that their voters were key to Obama's victory. On the other hand, maybe
"Obama faces less pressure for [a] diverse Cabinet." Just as long as they're not lobbyists ...