Thought I wouldn't mind the sheet look but it is awful, especially in the Royal rooms- the decorator at Disney who made that call should be fired.
so disappointing-looks beyond horrible and unfinished. Seems like a waste to refurb all those rooms within the past year and then take away all the bedspreads.
I didn't say it was generic for all Resorts. For example, All Star is different (old bedspread pattern) from Coronado. I don't know what it will look like at Port, but it's not the same for all Resorts.
Take a deep breath, Andre
Trying to take a deep breath.... and relax...
If the new top bedding isn't finished yet
and will eventually be designed to match with the room decor and colouring then I will have absolutely no problems with it; I'm in the "throw the heavy bedspread on the floor overnight" camp too, it's just too hot in Florida for so many thick layers. And I can appreciate the cleanliness issues too.
However, as the look stands at the moment (with or without a trendy strip of coloured material draped over the end of the bed) I really think that stark white completely detracts from the overall look and theme of the room. Pure white should really never be a part of any artistic palette.
I'm reminded of Disney Imagineering's own guru of colour, Disney Legend John Hench, who was getting exasperated with the CEO of United Technologies (the original sponsor of EPCOT Center's The Living Seas) who wanted the exterior of the new attraction to be "... White. Bright White. Blindingly White.". John got so frustrated at this lack of artistic understanding and design subtlety that he replied bluntly, "I have 33 different shades of white in my palette. Which is your personal favorite?"
Thanks for the pictures! I understand the reason behind the new bedding. But what's the point in replacing the pictures?
The reasoning was an artwork policy one. There has been a long established Disney tradition that artwork should never imply that characters from different eras/countries/stories/etc can exist together, or should be shown as actively interacting with each other. For example Belle from middle-ages France, Tiana from 20th Century New Orleans, Jasmine from ancient middle-eastern culture, etc. None of these should ever exist within the same image framework. I assume the Port Orleans building backgrounds (which I loved too) met with the same resistance; only Tiana really fits with that theme, and even then she should really be in French Quarter rather than Riverside.
To be honest, the first time I was told the storyline of the Royal Guest Rooms (the whole "Tiana invites her other princess friends to stay and they leave gifts" concept, fun though it is) I wondered how the heck it ever got approved beyond the drawing board stage in the first place. I suspect it got swept along with the whole "Disney Princess" (TM)(R)(C) franchise bandwagon, which itself broke a ton of old-school character integrity guidelines.
I also think I prefer the more traditional rendering style too, I agree that the new 3D look artwork just doesn't seem to be quite so honest to the original source material. It's also a shame that the
princes were omitted from the new artwork, as that helped reinforce the 'Royal' element and distance the theming from the general consensus that these were merely "princess" rooms.
Andre