In the article, they claim POP has much lower capacity than AS. Obviously this has never happened when I was there. It always seems PACKED (ex: food court in the am)!
I'm curious as to what you mean by these statements...capacity does not equate to occupancy.
I don't have actual numbers, but took a quick look at both resorts. The building designs are very much the same, although POP buildings are slightly longer, so they probably have a few extra rooms per building. But POP has only 10 buildings, and the AllStars have 10 each. If they are taking them as a combined unit, they have much more capacity right now. If they are treating them individually, I'd say they probably have on the order of 80 or so rooms less (total guess). But each one does have its own food court and main hall.
HI. Pop does have 4 floors where All-Stars have 3, so that makes each Pop building have 1/4 more capacity I believe.
I don't know the exact numbers, but I believe the two Pops when completed would have equaled the 3 All-Stars. Smarter construction, less land space - good idea on Disney's part, but the food courts probably should have been larger with more stations at Pop to distribute folks better.
I'm curious as to what you mean by these statements...capacity does not equate to occupancy.
I don't have actual numbers, but took a quick look at both resorts. The building designs are very much the same, although POP buildings are slightly longer, so they probably have a few extra rooms per building. But POP has only 10 buildings, and the AllStars have 10 each. If they are taking them as a combined unit, they have much more capacity right now. If they are treating them individually, I'd say they probably have on the order of 80 or so rooms less (total guess). But each one does have its own food court and main hall.
I'm sorry for using capacity, I really meant occupancy. I was referring to the information in the Jim Hill article regarding retheming Pop:
"Well, to be blunt, in the nearly five years that the Classic Years portion of Disney's Pop Century has been open, this Value Resort has never been able to maintain the same sort of steady high occupancy rate that Disney's All-Stars typically enjoy (Those three Value Resorts regularly experience occupancy rates of 95% and higher. Whereas Pop Century's occupancy rate is typically stuck in the 80s). Which WDW management blames -- in large part -- on Pop Century's unappealing theme.
Baby boomers may think that it's cool to see a huge can of Play-Doh or a giant Big Wheel. But these oversized icons had zero appeal for their parents or their children."
I disagree with the idea that Pop Century's theme is unappealing to most people. I think it is bright, colorful and fun for all ages. And I know that a crowded food court is in no way an accurate representation of occupancy but the resort, buses and food court always seem busy.
DW and I are both baby boomers, and find NOTHING about the huge cans of Play doh or a giant wheel the least bit amusing. Disney most certainly dropped the ball on that resort, IMHO.
You obviously didn't Boom any Babies if you don't know what a freaking Big Wheel is. Did it occur to you that, just MAYBE, other kinds of culture existed externally to what you witnessed in your life?
You're entitled to your opinion, but a great many of us find the stuff at Pop to be tremendously nostalgic. I grew up playing with Play-Doh, riding a Big Wheel, trying to figure out a Rubik's Cube, etc. In my opinion, the resort is unique and fun...but hey, at least I'm not trying to pass off opinion as fact.
Uhhh...you replied to a post that expressed an opinion, even ended the post with IMHO, and you attacked it like this? Perhaps you should read what you reply to.
DW and I are both baby boomers, and find NOTHING about the huge cans of Play doh or a giant wheel the least bit amusing. Disney most certainly dropped the ball on that resort, IMHO.
Now, as for the themeing.. I'm not a baby boomer.. but more accurately a Gen-X-er .. and I love all those elements at Pop. I think they were really designed for the Gen-X crowd and their children. But at this stage, my feelings wouldn't be hurt with a re-themeing - if it actually is in the cards.
Knox
I did notice several tractor trailers and box trucks with the name of a contractor company, JCQ Services, in the 50"s parking lot. Not sure if they are part of the remodeling crew for Classic Years or what....... They do have a web site and appears they do alot of remodeling at the resorts.
I dont think its the retheming that really bothers me, its more the idea of changing it from a value to a mod. The whole 'animation inn' theme seems to be identical to ASMovies. It makes no sense to me. Thankfully, Im sure it will be quite some time before (IF) a retheming does take place.
I do realize I am a bit late quoting this comment... but there was all sorts of construction equipment in the 50s lot when we were there back in early Oct. I felt as if they were using it for "storage" as much as anything.
Until someone sees bulldozers and construction staff.. then it's all just rumor.
There were bulldozers and construction equipment there. But it was all in the back corner and did not appear as if they were planning to use it. It was pretty obvious looking at it that it had been sitting there for awhile.