So the second question is, if it is not sustainable - then what do they do? Unlike Six Flags, they don't really have the option of selling out to local owners. An operation like Sea World requires massive resources. Lets pretend Sea World wanted to drop the San Antonio location. What company in their right mind would by an ocean based company in the center of Texas without access to the facilities, experts, and such that Sea World has at their San Diego and Orlando facilities. And for the record, even before the Texas location got divided up into 3 parts, it STILL felt like a miniature version of the coastal Sea Worlds. The Texas location is the most extreme example of the three, but I'd argue that you essentially need one on each coast at the very least. I'd argue that Sea World simply can not operate as a single location. So at most, they could drop the Texas location and cut their operations back to two locations. Or, just keep gating off different parts of the Texas location and trying to convince people they are worth paying separate ticket prices for. Either way, it shows the location isn't holding it's own financially, and since there will never be a buyer for it logistically, they either have to close it and walk away from it or keep finding ways to try and upcharge and hope it doesn't slaughter attendance to the point of being unsustainable.