pilferk
Jambo Wildbunch Gang
- Joined
- Nov 17, 2005
- Messages
- 6,881
The difference is that Song was buried and most of the world hasn't seen it (including me). Therefore most people don't know that it even exists. Who knows if it is a great movie or not. Disney refuses to let people see it because it's really racist.
Doesn't matter WHY people haven't seen it. They haven't.
And yet...Splash Mountain continues to pack them in...in pretty much every incarnation it exists in.
Regardless of the low box office total (even inflation adjusted) for Song of the South. Regardless of it's general public perception (or lack thereof).
As for Tron's/Song of the South's quality, as a piece of cinema...that wasn't your point, initially. You were using earnings to gauge use of a property. We've pivoted slightly to "how well known it is". If you're now going to change to "only movies I think are good should get rides"...you're going to have as many opinions as you do people.
Avatar made a crap ton of money. I don't think, beyond it's amazing visual effects, that it was a particularly good movie. And yes...I went to see it in theaters, so contributed to it's box office numbers. Having said that, I think it's strengths lend themselves well, given Disney's track record, to creating interesting attractions.
But that's neither here nor there: I've provided you an example where both factors (box office gross and public perception), really, don't have anything to do with how popular, or entertaining, an attraction is.
You, seemingly, don't like (or don't know about) Tron. And that's fine. But, looking at actual numbers (it wasn't a flop) AND at another popular attraction based on a property that did not make a ton of money, or is widely known...your point doesn't really seem to hold much water, either way.