Charade
<font color=royalblue>I'm the one on the LEFT side
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2005
- Messages
- 26,067
Again, I'm not going to argue the meaning of it, as I simply do not think it is relevant, and the only reason anybody would is to use it to smear the campaign (completely regardless of the fact that there is no there there to smear with). We've got very serious problems in this country and very serious differences of opinion on how they need be addressed. Going off on tangential nonsense like this just distracts from the real issues for nothing more than the pleasure of those few that enjoy the political bloodsport when played at it's most disgusting.
If she didn't inject herself into the campaign supporting his ideologies, then I agree, her comments would probably be irrelevant.
Surely you remember the "dust up" over Mama Bush's "let them eat cake" comments. Here's a woman that hasn't been in the political limelight for close to 20 years. What she says today should be just as irrelevant as it was when she was on the campaign trail or first lady. Or not? I guess it's a matter of perspective. Right?


If people went back over the college papers of just about ANYBODY, they'd be sure to find a statement that they could TAKE OUT OF CONTEXT - just as DisneyMom did - and make a big deal out of. I'm sorry, but I think the notion that anybody should give a rat's derriere about what Michelle Obama wrote in her thesis 20 years ago is completely ridiculous.