CowboyCO
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 12, 2005
- Messages
- 3,023
Here again, even though you identify with her decision to go back to work, that actually doesn't mean you two are the same person. You didn't have the benefits of an elected Lt. Governor to delegate to, nor did you have the benefits she has as a state employee.
There is a bit of a difference here. She chose to go back to work and leave her special needs child after 3 days. Whether or not she worked full days, half days, or one minute, the advertising the fact that she immediately returned to work is what doesn't sit well with -me.- She had a baby in April that is special needs. She will be running for VP for the next few months. She will be resigning as Governor to take the position of VP, possibly.
If the Lt. Gov is good enough to take over from her when she is elected VP, why is this person only ok to take over for 3+ days when Palin had a child this past April?
YMMV.
She didn't leave her "special needs" child to return to work. She took her baby with her. I know there are many Mom's who are able to balance this. With this being her 5th child, obviously it's not her first rodeo.. (BTW do Downs babies have more needs than a non-Downs baby at that age? I don't know.)


