I consistently get over 350 pictures per charge on my t1i. If I'm not using the flash much I've even gotten over 400. You should be fine if you just charge it over night or grab a second battery if you a "belt and suspenders" type of person.
OK-I just took the plunge and upgraded my XT-for those of you that have the t1i how is the battery life per charge?? We leave for WDW in 11 days and want to know what I am working with. TIA
Where have you guys found the off brand batteries for $5 and $8? I have the T1i also. We are going to the World in December and I really want to bring a back up battery. Can you charge it with the Canon charger or do you need a separate charger?
I don't use the off-brand batteries. While I don't doubt that Canon is making a nice profit from their batteries when someone sells a $50 battery for less than $10 *something* has to give. That something is usually quality control and testing.
could be.... but it could also mean that someone is selling a $10 battery for $50 !
I don't know about the T1i battery but the older XSi (450D) off brand batteries are sold very cheap at reputable sites like
http://www.dealextreme.com/details.dx/sku.20710
I don't see one at dealextreme for the T1i (500D) but www.bestbatt.com has them for $13
(www.bestbatt.com is good)
you will need the Canon charger
I just ordered this camera today along with an ef 75-300 lens. I decided against the lens that came with it (18-55) since I alrady have an old Rebel XS SLR with an ef 35-80 lens. This camera will be used primarily for shooting football games (daughter in marching band), no real low light. I know I'll need a different lens for that. I'm thinking about taking it with me when we go to Disney in November, not for shooting the parks, but I'm hoping to get some good shots of the family while at Wilderness Lodge. I appreciate any feedback.
I would have kept the 18-55mm. The 35-80mm lens is equivalent to 56-128mm which really doesn't get you much wide angle at all. It will make shots in closed areas difficult. Also the 18-55mm has IS making static shots easier to grab.
If you have the option I would also get the 70-300mm lens rather than the 75-300, it's a much better performer and has IS. Not sure if you have the opportunity to still do this.
Not a whole lot of feedback we can give you after you have already bought an item...
Actually, I purchased these after talking to the tech. support guy at Canon. He told me that the 18-55 was "Crap", and my other lens would offer more versatility. I know I had no issues whatsover using it with the old "film" camera, I don't have a need for wide angle, and didn't feel that the quality of the lens warranted the $100+ it was adding to the price of the body alone.
If the 70-300 IS zoom is out of your price range (as it was with us), the 55-250 IS zoom is a great lens, a very good bang for your buck. And if you combine it with the 18-55 you've got a large focal range covered between the 2 lenses. Granted they're not L glass, but they wield excellent results for the price.