hambirg
<font color=blue>Has tooted quietly in church<font
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2003
- Messages
- 2,407
But she can't prove her kid didn't do it either. No way my kid is getting the blame laid on him when there is as good of a chance that her child did it also.
It should just be chalked up to learning that when you let others use your stuff sometimes things happen and either deal with it or watch your stuff when it is being used more carefully.
Still wouldn't buy a new game. I wouldn't buy a used one either BUT if you feel you have to do something this is what I would do -wait till I found a used one and give her that.
This!
He was at her house, presumably being supervised by her. No one knows who damaged that disc over a month's time. No one saw your son being grossly negligent. . .like riding over it with his bicycle in their driveway. This is an important lesson for your sister to learn. If this was a smalls claims case, she would be laughed out of court.
Some people would say to just pay it. .. but seriously think about that. Why should you assume responsibility for something nobody knows happened or not, in her home, under her supervision? I think that's nuts. It's like saying. . .I let you drive my car last month and now it's making a weird noise. . .so it must have been something you did. Huh?
ETA- I wouldn't offer to have the scratches removed either. I would tell her about how SHE can take them in for that though. It's time Dsis learned to be responsible.
This would be totally different if she let him borrow the game, he took it home, it was not damaged, he played with it and returned it damaged. In that case I would have the scratches removed or replace it. BUT this is not the case at all!