How much one does or does not get paid, is no excuse for bad customer service, or rudeness, sorry.
Who said it was an excuse? Rather, it was an explanation, and it is to be expected.
There is a very strong correlation between labor cost and service quality.
If I paid $100 for service I had better get better service than if I had paid $80 for that service. Why else would I pay the higher price?
Don't go to that particular hotel anymore
That's really the best means for consumers to express their sentiments. Unfortunately, when all hotels, in the same class, provide the same quality, then consumers are faced with the decision to either accept the situation, or pay more (assuming there
are premium suppliers willing to provide better service at a premium -- in our economy, that's often not the case).
What's worse is that in many cases consumers who apply this
very rational logic end up hurting themselves, as they bounce from supplier to supplier, sticking with each just until the luck-of-the-draw results in them getting low-quality service from that one, before they hop to the next. In the end, they would have gotten low-quality service just as often if they stuck with one supplier, and would probably have established enough of a relationship with the supplier that each time they got low-quality service, they would have learned how to more readily get more comprehensive and timely satisfaction.