Here's a more neutral observer's review of today's James Joyce 10K, using Martha's report as a base:
What a race report I have!! Total time, 63:10 for 6.2 miles! Splits =
9.51 (OK, very scarey here, I CANNOT sustain this for an entire race; have to slow down),
10:14 (well, better, but still too fast),
10:37 (better but now too slow),
10:23 (made up time from mile 3),
10:15 (hm, too fast for the Minnie),
10:10 (oh dear, could I really be running this fast?) and bring it in the last 0.2 miles.
The only thing I can say is, Didn't I have 11 seconds in me to bring it in under 63 minutes!?!?!!!!! Now this is a PR for me, but I'm complaining that I couldn't bring it in under 63 minutes! LOL!!!!!
Okay, I guess I don't know how to copy and paste and have it show who the original author was. The above came from the RedDragon.
Mile 1 was the usual "starting a bit quick" plus it was mostly a long and gradual down hill. We did go through it in 9:51, but the effort was easy, no strain at all.
Mile 2 was a bit quicker than plan, but again I felt Martha was running easy. I'm not sure she felt the same way so . . .
In Mile 3 I intentionally eased off a bit. I know Martha was worried about our splits, but I didn't think she was exerting more effort than appropriate. Still, at mile 3 better to be safe, so we took or foot off the gas.
Mile 4 was the toughest mile on the course, some pretty long and steep hills. Our split here was encouraging, good work in a tough stretch.
In Mile 5 I pushed the pace a bit, hoping to bring us in sub-64. It as a fairly flat stretch, so I wanted to make sure we built some cushion to beat that number.
Mile 6 came back up the long, gradual hill of the first mile, and we drove up it pretty nicely. A DOPE on the side yelled we had only 1.2 miles to go when the exact number was about 0.8. We both yelled "Wrong" at him, and I cursed him sort of under my breath, so only Martha could hear me.
When we hit the last flat and saw the finish I thought we might get in under 63 minutes, but it was not to be.
Overall it was a lot of fun, a nice course, a beautiful cool and cloudy day, and a well run race. I had a lot of fun, and since I DNF'd it last year with a calf injury, and then broke down in the heat and humidity in Orlando in January, this was the first race I've really "run" since the Goofy in 2006. It was a positive enough experience to try it again.
And, on the course they have ladies and gentlemen in period dress reading passages from Joyce all over the course. Our favorites were 2 tiny ladies, identical twins at mile 1.5 and 5.7, and a gentleman reading in Gaelic at mile 4.5.
Makes me wish I was running Minnie with the gang next weekend. On second thought, being the sole male in a crowd of females, you can strike that statement. I'll stay here and read about it instead.
Craig
What a race report I have!! Total time, 63:10 for 6.2 miles! Splits =
9.51 (OK, very scarey here, I CANNOT sustain this for an entire race; have to slow down),
10:14 (well, better, but still too fast),
10:37 (better but now too slow),
10:23 (made up time from mile 3),
10:15 (hm, too fast for the Minnie),
10:10 (oh dear, could I really be running this fast?) and bring it in the last 0.2 miles.
The only thing I can say is, Didn't I have 11 seconds in me to bring it in under 63 minutes!?!?!!!!! Now this is a PR for me, but I'm complaining that I couldn't bring it in under 63 minutes! LOL!!!!!
Okay, I guess I don't know how to copy and paste and have it show who the original author was. The above came from the RedDragon.
Mile 1 was the usual "starting a bit quick" plus it was mostly a long and gradual down hill. We did go through it in 9:51, but the effort was easy, no strain at all.
Mile 2 was a bit quicker than plan, but again I felt Martha was running easy. I'm not sure she felt the same way so . . .
In Mile 3 I intentionally eased off a bit. I know Martha was worried about our splits, but I didn't think she was exerting more effort than appropriate. Still, at mile 3 better to be safe, so we took or foot off the gas.
Mile 4 was the toughest mile on the course, some pretty long and steep hills. Our split here was encouraging, good work in a tough stretch.
In Mile 5 I pushed the pace a bit, hoping to bring us in sub-64. It as a fairly flat stretch, so I wanted to make sure we built some cushion to beat that number.
Mile 6 came back up the long, gradual hill of the first mile, and we drove up it pretty nicely. A DOPE on the side yelled we had only 1.2 miles to go when the exact number was about 0.8. We both yelled "Wrong" at him, and I cursed him sort of under my breath, so only Martha could hear me.
When we hit the last flat and saw the finish I thought we might get in under 63 minutes, but it was not to be.
Overall it was a lot of fun, a nice course, a beautiful cool and cloudy day, and a well run race. I had a lot of fun, and since I DNF'd it last year with a calf injury, and then broke down in the heat and humidity in Orlando in January, this was the first race I've really "run" since the Goofy in 2006. It was a positive enough experience to try it again.
And, on the course they have ladies and gentlemen in period dress reading passages from Joyce all over the course. Our favorites were 2 tiny ladies, identical twins at mile 1.5 and 5.7, and a gentleman reading in Gaelic at mile 4.5.
Makes me wish I was running Minnie with the gang next weekend. On second thought, being the sole male in a crowd of females, you can strike that statement. I'll stay here and read about it instead.
Craig