Watching the interview now. Her story is unravelling. Presumably she did this interview to share her side of the story. Her excuses and ramblings are making her look worse if that's possible.
Because we are now supposed to accept anything people say they want to be. There are no morals or standards anymore. No solids...we live in a land of shifting wobbling jello. Marry your father, marry 6 women, pick a color...any color, don't work but have an iphone, be a thug and cry discrimination when you're arrested, turn your back while brave men die and then ask why it matters....it's an insane world.
If science can come up with a way to change a man to woman and vice versa, I am certain they can come up with a way to change skin color if one wishes to transition to black or white. What's the difference? If DNA cannot be changed to alter ethnicity, then it certainly cannot be changed to alter gender, as much as society makes excuses against that fact.
And if the argument is made that ethnicity runs deeper than skin color, then I'd also make the argument that gender runs deeper than just being able to change your body parts and clothes.
The "argument" is that she lied. Made up family members that didn't exist. Made up places of residence. Had she just said that she was born white but identified as black, then your analogy to transgender would work. But she didn't. So it doesn't.
Here's an interesting take on this issue:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/06/15/rachel-dolezal-naacp-race-column/71214732/
Another thing that has me wondering- Michael Jackson became "white"; he altered his skin color and traditional features to appear more Caucasian. I didn't see an outrage there. Was it because he was a mega-star? Was it because he didn't outright say he identified as white? Was it because he didn't try to lie about his background? (much harder to do when you're famous).
So, the question begs and answer- if she hadn't lied, hadn't tried to deceive and cover-up, would it then have been okay to identify as black?
I self identify as a 25 year old. So from now on I am forever age 25.
Here's an interesting take on this issue:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/06/15/rachel-dolezal-naacp-race-column/71214732/
Another thing that has me wondering- Michael Jackson became "white"; he altered his skin color and traditional features to appear more Caucasian. I didn't see an outrage there. Was it because he was a mega-star? Was it because he didn't outright say he identified as white? Was it because he didn't try to lie about his background? (much harder to do when you're famous).
So, the question begs and answer- if she hadn't lied, hadn't tried to deceive and cover-up, would it then have been okay to identify as black?
Here's an interesting take on this issue:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/06/15/rachel-dolezal-naacp-race-column/71214732/
Another thing that has me wondering- Michael Jackson became "white"; he altered his skin color and traditional features to appear more Caucasian. I didn't see an outrage there. Was it because he was a mega-star? Was it because he didn't outright say he identified as white? Was it because he didn't try to lie about his background? (much harder to do when you're famous).
So, the question begs and answer- if she hadn't lied, hadn't tried to deceive and cover-up, would it then have been okay to identify as black?
Here's an interesting take on this issue:
http://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2015/06/15/rachel-dolezal-naacp-race-column/71214732/
Another thing that has me wondering- Michael Jackson became "white"; he altered his skin color and traditional features to appear more Caucasian. I didn't see an outrage there. Was it because he was a mega-star? Was it because he didn't outright say he identified as white? Was it because he didn't try to lie about his background? (much harder to do when you're famous).
So, the question begs and answer- if she hadn't lied, hadn't tried to deceive and cover-up, would it then have been okay to identify as black?