samsteele
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 22, 2014
We also have similar legislation in Canada but it is complex both in legislation and in practice. Some of its common sense. Some of it isn't. None of it is easy . . . which may be a very good thing. Much of it is expensive. Whether expensive is good is in the eyes of the beholder. Automatics & semis are restricted weapons here but can be owned with registration (requiring background check) & use is supposed to be restricted to the range. While expensive (usually more than $700 CDN) to buy, they are popular with many collectors. There are also very strict limits on how many rounds a firearm's magazine is allowed to hold. So they are not illegal and not impossible to obtain. More difficult to obtain than in the US? Absolutely. But not impossible.We aren't necessarily an anti-gun nation, but we have those common sense laws in place that Pete is calling for.
Some elements of our gun control legislation highlight and often perpetuate a real rural-urban divide and mindset. I know responsible handgun collectors who target shoot and collect as a hobby. They abide by the licensing, fees and mandatory safe storage regs. They cannot and should not be blamed for handgun violence in our cities. Handguns are not part of our popular rural culture either in the past or today. When our Canadian West opened up, frontiers were policed with rifles and not handguns. Modern concealed weapons (handguns) require a special permit and it isn't that prevalent to legally carry. However, rifles and long guns are certainly part of our rural history and rural present.
I grew up in rural Ontario and rifles or long guns were then and remain a part of life. It is a right of passage for most rural boys to take their required gun safety course, submit their application, wait the 28 odd days, get their permit and then go with their Dad to buy their first .22 rifle. That permit is also needed to buy ammunition even at Walmart or Canadian Tire. When I was in undergrad, our Federal Government introduced long gun registration partly in response to campus massacres and domestic violence. It was difficult to have rationale discussions about this with my peers who grew up in cities. In my view, registration & fees for keeping long guns does little to curb violence and only taxes rural Canadians who have legitimate reasons for their rifles. My friends who grew up in condos as opposed to cottages and cabins could not understand why anyone would want to shoot anything, including an animal. They viewed a gun as a weapon and not a tool. Our long gun registry was dismantled by our previous Federal Government as a result of rural Canadians' strong objections and also immense cost. Our modern Canadian Constitution is much younger than our American cousins (patriated in 1982) and we have no similar Constitutional Right to bear arms. However, we were once a rural nation and our traditions and needs for rifles, at least in rural ridings, runs deep. For Canadians, gun control may be best addressed in the future on a regional basis. What works for Haliburton county will not work for Metro Toronto and vice versa. But even getting agreement on that approach is elusive as people are incredibly set in their beliefs and in my experience, calm discussion is not the norm. Food for thought: despite our regulations, per capita, Canadians own more long guns and rifles than Americans. Always have. Probably always will.