zebsterama
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2008
- Messages
- 748
I think the thing people are missing with the tear down versus renovation is the building itself. If they do a renovation only with another 50 year deed they are asking the major structural components to be structurally sound for over 100 years. Early to mid 90s construction may not last that long and by relying on that is a big risk to them. Also, a tear down would allow them to make the building itself a lot more energy efficient. They could take the risk of the renovation to flip it quicker in any case.
Aside from the allure of either building something completely different, or seriously changing the foundational footprint, or deciding to take something like Beach Club and turn it into a 30 story hotel - provided Disney does a complete gut/redo [and they would], you don't need to blow it up.
Things like structure / electrical / plumbing will all be fine for decades. HVAC would be a pain, and if they decided to do some kind of very different room configuration (that could very well change things), but as far as the structure holding up to the abuse of elements like weather/heat/cold (even hurricanes)/wear and tear, it's fine to last another cycle.
Depending on what they're doing, it may be easier/cost effective in the end to just start fresh (blow it up) but there's no pressing reason because of a fear of it not being able to hold up.