IIRC, blowing your nose at the table in a public restaurant is actually against the law some places.
It may not be against the law here, but it IS against the Bob.
IIRC, blowing your nose at the table in a public restaurant is actually against the law some places.
Bacon is supposed to be eaten with a fork?![]()
I guess if the bacon is extra crispy you can pick it up with your hand.
two handed eating makes me nuts. For example....using a fork to shovel food into your face with one hand, while biting on a roll in your other hand.
Ok, I haven't called anyone names or accused people of being infantile. Its no sweat off my back if people don't break their bread but that said,and in all fairness, breaking the bread in pieces IS kinda universal. I realize a lot of people might not have learned that , and that fine. But you will find this stated as the proper way to eat rolls in every major etiquette printing and lesson. I promise you, and no judgements here, but if you go to a fine dining establishment or a very formal dinner, that really is how it supposed be done
As far as the a pp asked about toast, I was taught to cut it in half, or triangles and then bit from the half.![]()
1) lip smacking
2) at a restaurant, if I'm eating my food and you see me, don't come up to me wanting to shake my hand. I'M EATING! The last thing I want to do is shake your nasty hand. I will acknowledge you, but don't get mad if I don't touch you.
3) I HATE it when someone blows or picks their nose at the table when others are still eating. Go to the bathroom. So gross.
OTOH, there's something to be said for blissful ignorance. You don't think about the bread thing because you learned it early on. I don't think about it because prior to this thread, I'd never heard of such a thing![]()
I find the idea of "tearing" off bits of food to be quite strange.
Frankly, if that's what was considered proper etiquette, I'm glad it's gone out of fashion or forgotten completely.
All due respect, my parents weren't sticklers for table manners that I recall - yet I've known these two (break/butter/bite; cut a bite at a time) for as long as I can remember. Not to imply we were allowed to act like heathens. I don't know where I learned, but I learned young.As evidenced by this thread I don't believe it is "basic etiguette". Most of us have never even heard of this. My mother was a stickler for table manners, as I am with my 6 year old daughter. I asked her about this and she said that she had never heard of it before. It was not something that either her mother or grandmother taught her or did themselves. They were also "very proper".
This is so interesting! (Please note I'm just chatting for the sake of chatting and not trying to correct anyone.) Like many others in this thread, I was raised by members of the Etiquette Police. I know my forks and that fingerbowls are for fingers and what to do with a napkin. The only time I can ever recall having heard of a "bread rule" was when my mother mentioned it as a curious artifact of her childhood. This would have been early 1950s.
If I had to guess, a Modern Mary Poppins would say that the reason the bread rule existed (or continues to exist, according to the debate) was that it simply looks more polite to bring a smaller bite of food to one's face rather than an entire roll. To that, I say pishposh! The first rule of being a lady is to make one's companions feel comfortable. If my dinner guest prefers to daintily hold the roll while taking bites, that is perfectly fine by me. And if they stuff the whole roll in at once, I would simply carry on with the conversation and allow myself some mental preparation in the event that I must perform the Heimlich Maneuver.
All due respect, my parents weren't sticklers for table manners that I recall - yet I've known these two (break/butter/bite; cut a bite at a time) for as long as I can remember. Not to imply we were allowed to act like heathens. I don't know where I learned, but I learned young.
Maybe it's regional? My family derives from Oklahoma and California. They have never heard of it.
Would you rather be blissfully ignorant or blissfully knowledgeable?
LOL, I too was raised by the etiquette police. We were taught to butter the piece of bread by letting it rest on the plate. It is impolite to hold the bread as it is being buttered. Then, after it is buttered, break off a piece at a time to eat it.
This is a conundrum. The "with" is implied, because [weKristaTX said:With all due respect, it is "With all due respect." It is not just "All due respect."
I don't know. My family came from Eastern Europe.Maybe it's regional? My family derives from Oklahoma and California. They have never heard of it.
You're assuming (a) the bread is served warm in a vessel that won't keep it warm and (b) your host isn't providing you butter at spreadable consistency, such as whipped butter, or temperature? Restaurants are generally good about this.Gumbo4x4 said:That depends on whether or not that knowledge is of any use to me. I do not care for big globs of unmelted butter, so I fully intend to keep buttering my entire slice of bread (and both halves of my roll) immediately upon receiving them.