Many of those mentioned previously bother me. Also the use of 'prolly' instead of probably. I think it is in the dictionary now, but I still cringe when I see it written out! Probably because I am old.
Not really misspellings and it doesn't really bother me but I really don't see the need for the various spellings of women such as Womyn, Womxn, Womban, Wimmin, or Womon.
Neither side of The Pond officially auses an a!ternate spelling of dining. And both sides of The Pond can or should reasonably be expected to know it's 'Ohana.
Neither side of The Pond officially auses an a!ternate spelling of dining. And both sides of The Pond can or should reasonably be expected to know it's 'Ohana.
The one that annoys me is the misuse of phase instead of faze.
You often see "it didn't phase me" which is meaningless. Also, "it didn't faze me" is much easier to write anyway!
More a grammar thing but it really bothers me when people use whom when they mean who. Interestingly, it doesn't bother me when people use who when they mean whom.
misuse of they're, their, there, to, too, you're, your, desert, dessert, also it is should have or could have not should of or could of
Irregardless-no just no.
You see, the word “regardless” (the correct version) already contains the negative suffix “-less” and means “without regard”. So, if we were to add another negative prefix to that word such as “ir-”, it would contain a double negative and mean “without without regard”.
To give you another reason why this is completely wrong, it’s because the English language doesn’t allow double negatives to occur in a single sentence or word. (from lingQ)