Divamomto3
<font color=CC99FF>The Tag Fairy advises you to lo
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2003
- Messages
- 1,593
Ok, I've read the entire 8 pages now and can I just say that I am WIGGED out big time! I have a 12 year old son. I can't imagine him having the opportunity or courage to complete a sex act. Maybe I'm totally naive about the courage part, but I can be sure there'd be no opportunity part.
What has me the most shocked, is the attitude that this is somehow an act that stems from pushing and prodding or even coercion on the boy's part. Are you all feeling that way because 1) he's a boy or 2) he's 2 years older or 3) he's "troubled"? Or a combination of the three?
I have 3 sons so I'm quite interested.
Is it his fault if the 13 year old has been allowed to act 15? Is it his fault if the relationship has been identified as a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship and allowed to be so by the parents? Obviously, regardless of chronological age, they are at the same maturity level. Because of his problems and her being allowed to act like an older teen, they probably average out at around 14 years old together. They are close enough in age to view each other as peers. This is not the same situation as a 17 year old boy and a 13 year old girl.
To the OP...I think you realize now that it was too much too soon. Being a parent is beyond hard. But my question is how and why you'd want or let your daughter be involved with this kid who has the great likelihood of living a troubled life. Aren't these the kinds of people we try to steer our children away from?
What has me the most shocked, is the attitude that this is somehow an act that stems from pushing and prodding or even coercion on the boy's part. Are you all feeling that way because 1) he's a boy or 2) he's 2 years older or 3) he's "troubled"? Or a combination of the three?
I have 3 sons so I'm quite interested.
Is it his fault if the 13 year old has been allowed to act 15? Is it his fault if the relationship has been identified as a boyfriend/girlfriend relationship and allowed to be so by the parents? Obviously, regardless of chronological age, they are at the same maturity level. Because of his problems and her being allowed to act like an older teen, they probably average out at around 14 years old together. They are close enough in age to view each other as peers. This is not the same situation as a 17 year old boy and a 13 year old girl.
To the OP...I think you realize now that it was too much too soon. Being a parent is beyond hard. But my question is how and why you'd want or let your daughter be involved with this kid who has the great likelihood of living a troubled life. Aren't these the kinds of people we try to steer our children away from?
) when his friend told my friend that he wanted to kiss me. But at the same time, in the same school and the same classes, there were girls who were having sex regularly at 13, not more than a dozen or so in a class of 120 (and probably the same for the boys). That was in 1981. So fully 20% of my eighth grade class was sexually active at 13/14 YO. At a private, catholic school, before MTV and curses on TV during family hour and PG-13 ratings at the movies.
), she skipped school, she even had sex IN school. My parents practically went insane. Looking back there are lots of things we can say our parents did wrong or could have done differently, but they did what they thought was best at the time. Most things just caused her to rebel even more. I am 2 yrs younger and we were always best friends growing up. I am SOOOOO lucky that I was usually just along for the ride and stayed out of most of the trouble!