I don't recall ever knowing or asking what was in my school food. If it tasted good, we ate it. If not, we devoured everything in sight when we got home.
I wonder how it was discovered, too. And, where did they get it? They’d pay a premium price too. I’ve had kangaroo before, but I don’t remember the taste. It couldn’t have been bad because I’m super picky.
I read an article that it caused kids major anxiety. Anxiety from what? Eating an animal that’s considered cute? It’s not like they were fine chowing down on Bessie.
Exactly.I am not against eating kangaroo. I am against being served something without my knowledge.
Or cat for that matter.I wonder if your reaction would differ if you found out you just ate dog meat? It’s perfectly legal and acceptable in many countries in Asia.
I think every person, children included, should be informed and able to decide whether they want to consume a certain animal. I remember when IKEA was putting horsemeat in their meatballs without listing the ingredient.
It's school food so unless the menu stated 100% beef chili then I'd assume there were all sorts of ground meats thrown in there.
There is a reason why that kind of stuff has been referred to as mystery meat by school children for decades.
Cat and dog meat aren't commercially available in the U.S., so, yes I would have a problem with the safety of eating that.Exactly.
I've lived in various places where maybe beef isn't the most common meat product.
But that doesn't mean that I want to eat something without knowing it.
And that would be your only problem?Cat and dog meat aren't commercially available in the U.S., so, yes I would have a problem with the safety of eating that.
While I might find it viscerally disturbing, I really couldn’t make a logical argument for not eating them, given I’m an omnivore. Your point about safety is valid though. I presume the kangaroo in question was subject to the same standards as any commercially marketed meat.Cat and dog meat aren't commercially available in the U.S., so, yes I would have a problem with the safety of eating that.
Isn't buying school lunch a choice generally? Usually there are also vegetarian options.
As a parent of 3, I've never been given an ingredient list for school lunches...just a description. As my children don't have any religious or medical dietary descriptions, I would just assume that ground meat is whatever ground meat that is approved by sanitary health standards (I would agree that I don't want the chef just cooking up his hunt from last weekend).
Are there any medical or religious reasons why a student could eat ground beef and not ground kangaroo? If so, it should be labelled, like I would expect say pork to be noted when used.
While I might find it viscerally disturbing, I really couldn’t make a logical argument for not eating them, given I’m an omnivore. Your point about safety is valid though. I presume the kangaroo in question was subject to the same standards as any commercially marketed meat.
Good question. I wouldn’t choose to eat either one under normal circumstances but not because I think cats have any more (or less) inherent value than cows.Would you be upset if you found out the burger you just ate contained dog or cat meat?
And that would be your only problem?
Good question. I wouldn’t choose to eat either one under normal circumstances but not because I think cats have any more (or less) inherent value than cows.
I said earlier that I agree, in general, that everybody should be able to choose what they eat or don’t eat. But in reality, unless you make it yourself there’s no guarantee of full disclosure. For example, if the cook should have notified the diners there was kangaroo in the chilli (when it was not reasonable to assume there was), is there also a responsiblility to say there’s broccoli in there (also not expected in chilli). I’m trying to stay logically and ethically consistent here - I think the issue here is being coloured by the emotion evoked by kangaroos.
Would you be upset if you found out the burger you just ate contained dog or cat meat?
Good question. I wouldn’t choose to eat either one under normal circumstances but not because I think cats have any more (or less) inherent value than cows.
I said earlier that I agree, in general, that everybody should be able to choose what they eat or don’t eat. But in reality, unless you make it yourself there’s no guarantee of full disclosure. For example, if the cook should have notified the diners there was kangaroo in the chilli (when it was not reasonable to assume there was), is there also a responsiblility to say there’s broccoli in there (also not expected in chilli)? I’m trying to stay logically and ethically consistent here - I think the issue here is being coloured by the emotion evoked by kangaroos.
That’s just bizarre - I’ll never understand why anybody cares what anybody else doesn’t eat. Now that I’ve thought about the other question a little more, well, I’d think it was gross (same as if I inadvertently ate brains or snake or 1,000 year old egg or something) but I’d get over it. I’m not sure what definition of “upset” you’re going for.But would you be upset if you found out you just ate dog or cat meat?
As a plant based eater with allergies you bet I look at the ingredient list in all my food before I buy it or order it. I prefer to eat my own food and it’s why I always try to rent an apartment or condo when travelling. Sadly their are people out there who think it’s hilarious to sneak animals in vegan’s food.
Because I was fed something I didn’t know about? Yes
Because they’re cute and cuddly and considered off limits? No
That’s just bizarre - I’ll never understand why anybody cares what anybody else doesn’t eat. Now that I’ve thought about the other question a little more, well, I’d think it was gross (same as if I inadvertently ate brains or snake or 1,000 year old egg or something) but I’d get over it. I’m not sure what definition of “upset” you’re going for.