roliepolieoliefan said:
Only reason why she told my mom and the other cousin at the funeral about the no kid policy was because my mom said I planned to come and the other cousin was telling her about the beach trip.
Well, to be honest, it sounds like she expected/planned/is concerned with only the part about you (or who is) attending her wedding. She probably had NO idea you intended to combine her wedding with a beach vacation with your kids, so it's not unreasonable that the subject of children did not come up at all until your mom or cousin mentioned your intention to combine the wedding and the beach.
I would have thought since for over a year now, after every sentence or included in every email, Can't wait to see you at the wedding. A little tidbit like no kids, would have been nice.
On the other hand, "Can't wait to see you and the kids at the wedding" would have been a better indication that kids
wouldbe invited.
If my family is at the wedding and DH is working what am I supposed to do with my kids?
Well, you could consider using what is apparently a GROUP babysitting service about which your cousin has ome information. Maybe it's sort of like a day care but for special events - so there are multiple caretakers and children from more than just your family all in the same safe location. Why not look into it further before saying "no"?
DH works all kinds of hours and takes call. What if he gets called out at 3am? Don't think someone would be very happy to get out of bed to watch my kids. Plus there is no one. We use my mom, not sitters.
Is there a reason you can't/won't start using sitters now, five months in advance, as a trial? You don't even have to leave your kids alone with whomever you hire - what about a mother's helper-type person, maybe a high school student, on weekends? You stay home, she stays at your house and takes care of your kids while you go about your business, you are right there if there is any problem, you can observe how she behaves and how she and your kids interact... and then, if things are working out well when the invitation comes, bring her with you to take care of your kids while you attend the wedding.
The irritation is the people in this thread who just don't get it. Why keep suggesting the same thing over and over and I have to keep explaining why this isn't possible.
But that's got to be at least partly because you keep saying "that's not possible", instead of considering some of the sincere suggestions offered.
Tink888 said:
The first thing I'd do is send a quick and friendly email to your cousin who is getting married to confirm that it's a no kids wedding. You're going by third party info right now and for all you know, your kids might be the exception to the rule.
I'm betting no. Can you imagine the furor THAT would cause? This person's kids can come because they want to spend a few days at the beach after the wedding, but nobody else's kids are invited?
Honestly, it is too bad the OP, her cousin, and her mother won't attend - but those are decisions they are making, well in advance, based on information they have well in advance. If the bride and groom don't want any children at their wedding, well, it's
their wedding.
MommaSnowWhite said:
I don't understand why wedding have become such "affairs" - when I throw a party I think of my guests first and myself last. Shouldn't a wedding be similar?
A wedding can consist of four people - bride, groom, and the required two witnesses, and still be an "affair". It is the special day for the bride and groom - if they want no children at the wedding, that is their right.
hereyago said:
Well if bride and groom eventually have kids, no fear, they will be hitting you up for baby shower gifts. because it will be their kid.
Well,
they won't - because (unlike having a wedding with no guests under a certain age) having your own anything-shower IS a breach of etiquette. But there's a very simple response to any such invitation: "Thank you for asking, but I cannot".
JoBird said:
OP-- could you still plan on attending the wedding-- but ONLY slip in at the last second to the ceremony- with the kids in tow, sit on the very back pew and slip out if the kids become unruly-- and then not attend the reception but just go on to the beach instead?
Well, yeah. As long as the ceremony is in some public place, like a church or a park, technically anybody can attend - invited or not. So, sure, if the OP wants to see her cousin's daughter get married and share that experience with her children, nobody is going to ban them from the church. Then, yes, you're right - they can all head right to the beach instead of the reception!
roliepolieoliefan said:
What have I said that was nasty? Except the hoity toity wedding part? Its all the NJ people who keep saying that $150.00 a plate is average. What do you people do, take 2nd mortgages out for wedding? Like the rest of us are sub-par because we don't partake in this type of wedding activity.
It's got nothing to do with hoity-toity, or sub-par. You pay the going/average rate. You think $150 a plate is bad? Try planning a Disney wedding!
mickeyboat said:
Finally, I do think the bride was a little rude not to make it clear early on that children would not be included - especially for out of town guests and guests with children. I understand the OP's frustration.
You're not wrong - but figure, a probably childless bride to be, planning her wedding, is likely NOT thinking about what arrangements her invited guests with children usually have when they want/need to go out without the kids, or what arrangements those guests might need to make to attend her wedding without those children.
okeydokey said:
The OP said the bride-to-be expressed surprise that some may not come to her wedding because of child care issues. What did she think people would do with their kids if they had to drive several hours to attend her wedding and the whole family would be at the event so unable to babysit?
Like a number of posters here, she's probably surprised that some parents have no non-family babysitters available.