bledsoedoc
Mouseketeer
- Joined
- Dec 11, 2011
- Messages
- 114
As I understand it, food allegries are not considered a disability or protected under ADA. Not to cause a fight, but the ADA is very specific to what is and is not a disability which limits life activities.
Under the ADA an individual has a disability and is protected by the law if he or she has an "impairment" that "substantially limits" one or more "major life activities."
What is an impairment?
The concept of "impairment" includes physiological as well as mental or psychological conditions. A physiological impairment is a disorder or condition, a cosmetic disfigurement or an anatomical loss affecting any of the major body systems. A psychological or mental impairment includes most disorders, such as mental retardation, organic brain syndrome, emotional or mental illness and special learning disabilities. Under this inclusive definition of "impairment" a broad range of conditions have been protected under the ADA, including:
Depression
Back problems
AIDS
Epilepsy
Diabetes
Blindness
Schizophrenia
Mobility Impairments
Think, concentrate and interact with others
Ada clearly protects food allergies at school and work and the Ada amendments protects on planes. I did a quick Google search to double check. Well, tripled check.
But really, you were making my point. Which isn't even relevant to this thread. Disney is great when it comes to food allergies, but it isn't an Ada requirement. It is more a cover your butt liability issue. And they really want to help their customers.


