I don't see what all the fuss is over. I think that it just might be possible that we tend to have a skewed view here in our little microcosm of DIS.
I mean there are, what, about 22,600 SSR owners? Can all of them be miserable?
Last year, my boss at that time came back from a vacation in WDW and told me that he had bought at SSR. In fact, it rekindled my interest in perhaps looking at
DVC again, since the last time I looked in about 1995 or so.
He had taken the tour of SSR and really liked the location and the resort. He likes to golf and thought it was perfect. He was also attracted to the extra 12 years (why, I don't know, he's older than me, and I know I'll be dead by the time my DVC contract expires).
I had asked him if he had looked at resale, and he had. He and his wife had wanted SSR. They perferred it to the other resorts.
He also doesn't hang out on DIS.
So, I find myself asking, of that 22,600 there must be a significant number that are jolly happy with their purchase.
I mean to be honest, I love DIS, but we (I include myself in that we) do tend to obsess a bit more about DVC than might be healthy.
I refuse to believe that given the number of members out there, they are all fretting over bookings, and invest quite so much energy in planning, a little more than perhaps it merits.
When all is said and done, there are 91,000+ registered DIS members, of that a much much smaller set who hang out on the DVC boards. Of that an even smaller subset who are vocal and post regularly. It just strikes me that perhaps what is said here might not represent the majority.
So, my point is, probably there are loads of happy SSR owners. And owners of other DVC resorts who would not mind staying at SSR, and infact welcome the opportunity.