ColoradoBelle1
My beast never turned into a Prince. Remember, it
- Joined
- Jan 16, 2005
- Messages
- 794

I believe there are some things re smoking that we can all agree on:
1.Disney should guarantee smoking or non-smoking rooms at the time of reservation.
2.We can all be a little kinder to each other. About lots of things, including being less judgemental about our friends who smoke. THat being said, however, stating that smoke bothers ME isn't being judgemental. Expecting someone to keep their smoke to themselves isn't being judgemental. Expecting that cig butts should be placed in proper containers like all other litter isn't being judgemental. Expecting that if rooms were designated nonsmoking that no one would smoke is also nonjudgemental. Calling smokers names or telling them to go stay somewhere else...IS judgemental.
3. If rooms were designated as smoking /non-smoking, how could that be effectively enforced? I agree with a poster above who said that Imagineers could solve the enforcement issue:One quick thing comes to my mind...the airlines banned smoking on planes so people went into the bathrooms and smoked. So they posted a sign in the bathrooms saying that smoking was an offense punishable by fines and maybe even deportation from the plane without a parachute AND they put smoke detectors in the bathroom with big alarm systems. Hence, the easy answer: all nonsmoking rooms come equipped with smoke alarms specially designed to pick up cigarette smoke. If triggered, red lights would flash, obnoxious noises (hopefully confined to that unit) would trigger, and a monitoring relay would be sent to security. The 'culprit' would have to pay for the service of resetting the alarm. SO: anyone who didn't smoke in a nonsmoking room wouldn't be hassled, but anyone who smoked in a nonsmoking room would pay say, a $500 fine each time. The fines would go towards paying for the devices and the monitoring of same.
One poster said something that I believe bears repeating: there are two sides to the issue of cigarette smoking in the rooms or on balconies. But the sides aren't equal BECAUSE smokers can choose to take a smoking room or a nonsmoking room...so they have access to 100% of the rooms, even tho the nonsmoking rooms might cause them a little inconvenience. Nonsmokers (who are bothered by smoke) don't have that option. They would be confined to the % of rooms that were truly nonsmoking. (Perhaps some smokers might think that nonsmokers do...but it is a health issue NOT a convenience issue for most if not all nonsmokers. )
I believe that because that since people purchased DVC units believing that they could smoke...that DIsney shouldn't ban smoking completely. I believe it would be fair to limit the number of units that smokers can smoke in and guarantee smoking/non smoking rooms at the time of reservation. Finally I believe it reasonable to enforce no smoking in the non/smoking rooms.
Now I have a question for smokers, and it is sincerely asked:
How inconvenient is it for you to have to leave the room to smoke? Would I be correct in assuming that the major inconvenience would be getting up and having to get dressed before having the first cig and then that after some hot 'amore'

So: the DVC members are a strong group. I think we should propose to Disney that both smoker owners and nonsmoker owners feel it should be our RIGHT to have guaranteed dedicated smoking non-smoking rooms at the time of reservation. We also feel that Disney should enforce nonsmoking in nonsmoking rooms by posting a 'notice of penalty' and having alarm sensors in the nonsmoking units to prevent smoking abuse. Would any DVC member, smoker or non, be opposed to this arrangement?
Colorado Belle