I don't believe the gulf between what the consumer expects and what they receive is solely based on inflated expectations on the consumers part. I think this is a two way street. We see the consumer who has sold their soul based virtually on price alone and not quality (big box retail mentality), and the business side, which has sold their corporate soul to no longer provide the best product (not saying WDW), but instead the least expensive product they can produce or offer to appease the profit margin. I'm not saying either is wrong, but both sides have given up a proper balance in purchasing and producing.
However, you're not digging deep enough: Businesses pursue profit, not for its own merit, but rather to further the financial interests
of their owners, which again comes back to society, such as the folks in society who invest their savings, for vacations, for college, for retirement, etc., in stocks, mutual funds, etc. It still comes back to people - on you and me - no matter how you slice it. Those unreasonable expectations we collectively hold as consumers, well we hold comparable expectations when we're investors as well. And that's what drives the way things are.
As a consumer, I expect to be treated for what I am, a shareholder (not a stockholder) in that company.
I think you meant "
stakeholder" The term "shareholder" and "stockholder" are
synonyms "stockholder, bondholder, part-owner, sharer".
I have a vested interest in that business for my consumer needs.
Again, I think your wording is problematic, and drive a misunderstanding of the reality. Consumers do not have a "vested" interest. They have a non-vested interest... precisely the opposite. That's one of the reasons why when the objectives of consumers and of owners clash, the objectives of the owners win - because the owners have a vested interest while consumers have a non-vested interest.
As a business owner (and I am) I don't dispute the fiduciary responsibility I have toward my partners and those within my business who depend on receiving a paycheck every two weeks. However, I also have a responsibility toward my customers.
As mentioned before, you need to operate legally, which includes being honest about what you're offering and what you're going to provide. You also need to provide what you offer safely, and assuring security. Those are the only responsibilities to your customers that could trump the responsibilities to the owners, for the reason mentioned above. You do have other responsibilities to your customers, but those responsibilities are subservient to the responsibilities to the owners. If it doesn't make a difference to the owners, then surely you should be fulfilling those responsibilities to your customers. Indeed, many responsibilities to customers actually
serve the interests of the owners, and as such are responsibilities that should be fulfilled because they satisfy the responsibilities to the owners.
I guess what I am trying to say is IMHO it's not just the consumer more than anything else as you stated, It's both sides.
I don't disagree, but if push comes to shove, there is a priority, and it is the long-term best interests of the owners, over the interests of customers.
You do type a good type, and type it with much eloquence; for that I do commend you. However, and please don't take this as a personal attack, I have yet to see you view the opinions on this thread from both sides of the fence.
Well, to be fair, I disagree with the premise, and am asserting that the premise actually stems from something other than what is claimed. There is no way for me to see this specific thing from the other side of the fence without refuting what I actually believe. I did say, many times in this thread, that I respect the right of the poster to feel differently. That is effectively "viewing the opinions from the other side of the fence".
There are no absolutes here
Yes, there are. Some things I mentioned earlier in this message (such as the relative priority of vested interests over non-vested interests) are absolutes.
Things only get better in the world of consumerism when both sides understand and value each other.
Absolutely. Understand that businesses almost universally do understand the consumer half of the equation, while by contrast consumers understand very little of the marketing, sales and operations management half of the equation.