Does a decomposing human smell differently than a decomposing mammal ?
I have smelled plenty of decomposing, dead animals, so was just wondering.
I am not sure someone correct me if I am wrong, wasnt there someone on there that testified that animals had more of a sweet smell? Thats what I remember hearing but I could be way off track.
Dr. Tim said that he had been working with dead bodies for a number of years, I found it odd that after smelling the car two years later he admitted there was an odor, but he neglected to say that it was definetly not a dead body smell. He's familiar with death so IMO the smell should have been a sure sign.
The defense team called Dr. Huntington the day Caylee's body was DISCOVERED, 8 days before it was identified as her. I find that suspect.
My opinion it always comes back to the smell of decomposition in the car. At least 6 or more people have testified to smelling it, including Casey's parents. There was a dead body in Casey's car and no one will ever get me to change my mind about that fact.
I don't know what is worse, this witness, Baez, or is flip chart! I wonder if the jury is as fed up with his flip chart as I am.
I would never describe it as sweet, but maybe it is compared to human remains?
Does a decomposing human smell differently than a decomposing mammal ?
I have smelled plenty of decomposing, dead animals, so was just wondering.
I wonder if flip charts are a defense thing. The trial I was on had a flip chart too. It didn't impress us jurors at all.
Like I said I could be so wrong, there has been so much testimony I cant keep it straight. Thats bad my head is spinning. I better check myself before I dont know what is what.![]()
I'm thinking that the expert said, early in the trial, that it was the human body that smelled sweeter than animals in decomposition.![]()
Vass also said that he is capable of distinguishing the smell of human decomposition compared to dead animals.
I recognized it as human decomposition odor, said Vass about the smell he inhaled when he opened the can containing the sample.
Animals tend to have a more muskier scent. Domesticated animals like a pig have a much sweeter scent than humans, Vass explained.
Link to article: http://purposenews.com/news/?p=4260
Yes, and Casey knew there had been a dead body in the car, tried to cover up the smell with garbage, and tried to ditch the car when the smell wouldn't go away.
Thinking impartially - if George was in on this with her, couldn't she go to him with this problem? And wouldn't he have helped her get rid of the car?
Argument against that - she didn't go to George for help, he didn't help her ditch the car, he was even the one who went to pick up the car from the tow yard.
Conclusion - George had no clue what was going on. He wasn't involved. Casey acted alone.
Further - if Casey acted alone, then can we rule out the fact that it wasn't an accident? Is that too big a leap to make? The duct tape is indeed the smoking gun in this case. We keep coming back to the question that if it was an accident, what was the duct tape for?
With all the lakes and retention ponds around here, I am shocked that George didn't dump that car in one as soon as he smelled decomposition. I am also surprised that Casey didn't take that route. She could have said the car broke down and when she went back for it, it was gone. It would likely have taken months for them to find the right lake where it was dumped and all signs of decomposition would be gone.