Mackenzie Click-Mickelson
Chugging along the path of life
- Joined
- Oct 23, 2015
- Messages
- 30,138
Though that is not the fault of the school being open by the mere fact of it being open. When people say that it's because they become part of the same cohort and thus continual exposure, whether at school or elsewhere, is why you see the risk being lower. If Johnny and Billy were both remote and thus never attended school their parents could still say "yeah you can be in the same social circle/cohort". Truly I think parents see that their kid is friends with so and so already and allow them to see each other. If you haven't allowed your kid to see their friends, regardless of school being in session or not, in nearly 8 months you're probably the minority at this point.Oh I think gatherings are causing most of the spread but sadly many assume once schools are open that it is safe to gather. "They are hanging out together in school so why shouldn't Johnny go to Billy's sleepover party? Johnny is already exposed..."
To give some stats the local news just covered one of the large districts in the area which is looking for guidance from the County Health Department due to community spread being high. The majority, though not all, parents want their kids in schools in my area. Anyways the school district had approximately 27,000 students has 315 students presently in isolation (be it that they are positive or have symptoms). 53 staff are as well. Less than 6 cases are from either the school or extracurricular activity. According to the County Health director, presently no outbreaks (defined by X number of cases traced to one point) are related to a school within the county (just isolated cases here and there).