captaincrash
<font color=darkorchid>!!!Surrender over yer LOOT!
- Joined
- Feb 23, 2005
- Messages
- 10,508
Stace congrats on the new camera. I was looking at the D40X and the Cannon Xti. I am not one to be carrying around a lot of equipment and therefore went for a bridge camera Olympus SP560. Has a 28-486mm lens with ISO50-6400. I know that I will not get the image quality as you but I don't have room in my suitcase for all of the lenses. I still believe that its not the camera but the photographer.
![]()
My spouse has been clammoring for a replacement camera for her - since I seem to have LOST her SD-850. And now we're leaning for the slim and high ISO sort - lke this Fuji 40 something or other. It was on clearance at Costco - only $167 plus there's a $30 rebate! It seems to have a reputation for usable power up to ISO 800 but it goes to 1600. YOUR camera with ISO 6400 as a boost max sounds pretty ... impressive.
Right now I am wavering between the Canon 40D and the rumored FULL FRAME 7D expected in Q2 of 2008. It would be a bridge between the full pro bodies and a 40D with a rumored cost of $1800. Of course, at this stage the talk has a real wispy and vaporous quality to it. Supposedly there is a UPC code filing for it - and the recent price reductions in the current entry level full frame body - the 5D seem to harkon the impending arrival of the 7D. Plus the competition from Nikon suggest the 7D would likely have a certain specification profile too.
At any rate - your Oly looks like a digicam I would be proud to use:

And you're right! It IS the photographer that makes the memorable images. Of course, there IS a minimum threshold of equipment necessary for most images. IE, you can only achieve so much with silver halide powder on a daguerreotype mirror, eh? But wouldn't it be tremendously cool to work with one of these babies?
