4luv2cdisney
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Mar 30, 2008
- Messages
- 2,400
OK, I know that I'm behind, and I may be a bit strange (and I don't think that the daughter is going to win much- if anything)...
BUT
I'm reading through the Mom's deposition, and got to the part where they took the trip to Vegas and left the girls in the care of the now 18 year old and I'm like
You KNOW she's been acting up, you KNOW she's been partying like crazy, you KNOW she's been running around with the boyfriend.... and instead of actually having the grandfather (who would make them do chores and enforce rules) you leave them alone with neighbors to watch? And then are surprised when she gets in trouble at the Homecoming Dance?
Um..... yeah.....
My parents would have had us moved in with the grandparents, not the grandparents coming to us, and too bad if *we* didn't like it.
I thought so, too! I mean, they said they found out about an "alcohol rage" she was planning before they left!! WOW!
I also noticed that on one hand the parents say this all came on suddenly (like when the boyfriend cam onto the scene) but their statement includes a situation involving stealing, sneaking out, and alcohol consumption dating back to 2011. Also, in telling about another boyfriend she had freshman year, that they drove her there every week and later found out there were alcohol parties there regularly. As freshman.
I also didn't think the email from the dad was the "come back home, just follow the rules" he claims. He mentions her needing to go to counseling "before coming home". And then "there are other things we can address if we get closer...."
Bottom line: I just don't think the parents are being completely truthful either.
I'm not typically a "it's the parents fault" kind of gal, but I do believe some of the girls allegations. The parents admit to spoiling her and being lenient with rules and I think they should take some of the responsibility for that.
I don't understand why the evidence the daughter has submitted isn't being shown with the court documents. We get to see the emails, transcript from the voicemail, and DCFS (or whatever its called in NJ) letters that the parents submitted, but none of the exhibits referenced in the daughters statement. Why?!
There are several documents I'd like to see, but especially the statement from the teacher that overheard the phone conversation when the parents were in Vegas. Were the parents as nasty as the daughter in the voicemail?
I don't think it's going to matter. I doubt they will set a legal precedent that allows kids to sue their parents for college tuition.
I just don't think you can point a finger at the "spoiled brat" without pointing a finger at the ones who spoiled her.