It's a vow in life not in endanger the lives of other people. It's the same as driving drunk, at least with driving drunk, the person is usually driving at night with less traffic. Breaking a vow is MUCH less of a problem than potentially killing people. Sorry, they don't compare, potentially killing people ALWAYS trumps hurting someone's feelings in the game of who is worse.
Idk about you, I'd rather have someone cheat on me than have a good chance of killing me. I like my life, hurt feelings=something I can recover from. Death=not something I can recover from.
I definitely think some men can seperate sex and love. Absolutely. Look at jesse James. I would not want to be married to a man like that but I know quite a few who feel like that.
Did you even read my post? LOL, typical over-reaction from the Dis. I said talking on a cell in the car was wrong, and I said they were different situations. I actually think putting people's lives in danger is a worse (and jailable) offense. But the situations are not comparable, and therefore it was a silly comparison. Is that really so hard to understand? Try reading the post and not putting your own feelings onto others.
I've known someone who was like this, my best friend that I've known since I was 2. I say that because I trust what he tells me in what he says, and I know when he's lying or not telling me the whole story.
James and his wife Sarah got married very young, they were only 19. They had been together since they were 13 though. Now, at 25, he has managed to be with another woman since, someone that we both know, as does Sarah. There's nothing wrong with James, Sarah or the other woman Katie. They're all three wonderful people who, imo, have better morals than 95% of the people I know. Cheating, whether you're the cheater or the person cheating with, doesn't make someone bad, nor does that mean they lack morals. And it doesn't mean there's anything wrong with you either.
I just think people get caught up into bad situations, or tempting ones and they suffice. James and Katie were doing their extramarital activities for about 2 months. It had nothing to do with how he loved Sarah... NOTHING. There was nothing to sway James away from Sarah either, no fighting, no financial problems, all in all, many people would envy their situation (aside from the affair). He ended it, not because anything emotional changed but because Katie was going to grad school at Columbia.
It's very easy to judge a situation when you cannot see it first hand. And while I got a good look at it, I still didn't see it first hand. But I'm not going to think any less of a person, especially my best friend, because of a series of "bad decisions".
I'm not saying cheating is OK but to make it a black & white situation is... unfair (for lack of a better word).
It's a vow in life not in endanger the lives of other people. It's the same as driving drunk, at least with driving drunk, the person is usually driving at night with less traffic. Breaking a vow is MUCH less of a problem than potentially killing people. Sorry, they don't compare, potentially killing people ALWAYS trumps hurting someone's feelings in the game of who is worse.
Idk about you, I'd rather have someone cheat on me than have a good chance of killing me. I like my life, hurt feelings=something I can recover from. Death=not something I can recover from.
I do not believe people who cheat love their spouses. Cheating is not an accident or a mistake. It is a deliberate choice. IMO it is a form of abuse.
I don't believe that any cheater loves anyone. They don't love their spouse, because they choose to deceive and lie to the spouse. And, they don't love their piece on the side either, because--they implicate that person in an inherently deceitful relationship.
I am using another name but just need some advice and have just been trying to process something. Here goes...
When a man has or seeks an affair, is it still possible that he is completely happy with his wife and his home life, but still just wants an occasional "thing" on the side to add some spice? I guess I've always thought there had to be more to it than that. Also, I think, how can someone who loves their spouse, loves their family, goes to church, etc. and still want something that is so harmful and hurtful? How is that even possible? How is it possible for a man to be happy with his life and do that?
My male friend I have shared this with says yes, a man can be completely happy at home and love his wife, not want a divorce, he just wants a fling from time to time. I don't get it...if men think that way, how can you fight that? If it's not about being happy, than how can a woman even begin to deal with something like this? It would be almost easier to understand if there were admitted issues, or the man wasn't happy, but I don't know how to deal with this kind of thinking.
Lust in Translation: Infidelity from Tokyo to Tennessee, by Pamela Druckerman
Review from Booklist
Here's a surprise: the U.S., which in the past 30 years has grown more open-minded about some sexual issues (such as homosexuality and premarital intercourse), has at the same time grown substantially stricter when it comes to extramarital affairs. Americans are vehemently against adultery, ranking it just a bit below polygamy and human cloning on the list of major no-nos. But in many other countries adultery is not such a big deal--often it's accepted if not formally condoned. In her quest to find out what it is about extramarital sex that provokes such widely differing reactions, the author visited 10 countries, including the U.S., Russia, Japan, and France, and spoke with adulterers, cuckolded spouses, sexologists, marriage counselors, and other interested parties. Interestingly, there seems to be no generally accepted view of adultery. Is it a sin, or a harmless pastime? It depends on whom you speak to, and where you speak to them. This engagingly written, intellectually provocative book is sure to be hotly debated by special-interest groups and individuals who think they know what's best for everybody else. David Pitt
Copyright © American Library Association.
I'm currently reading a book called "Lust in Translation" which you might find interesting.
Did you know that in Japan, it's not cheating if you pay for the sex?
Anyway, it was interesting to me to find out how many ideas I had assumed were universal were really just cultural. It doesn't mean I condone cheating - I'm just getting a broader perspective on it as I read this book.
There are people who seem to have all kinds of arrangements and what works for one couple may not work for another. The important thing is to come to an agreement as to how to coexist and then stick to it.
Well, I can tell you the WIFE is not okay with it, they do not have an agreement. He also just says "there are no issues, I'm not unhappy, I love my wife, I just like some fun on the side once in a while".
Otherwise, the family is a pillar...good jobs, great kids, look perfect on FB, go to church, have "positions" in the church, etc.
I just don't know how to deal with the husband...he doesn't have a conscience or see anything wrong. He would never divorce his wife, he "loves" his life as it is.