mickey2000
Pin trader
- Joined
- Jan 2, 2000
- Messages
- 3,513
Next year they're going to start serving seagull.
Thanks for the great reply! Now thats funny !

Next year they're going to start serving seagull.
What menu are you looking at? The dinner menu for WPC lists a few red meat choices in the entree section.Where's The Beef????
Apparently not at Wolfgang Puck's Cafe!!!!!!!!!!
Sincerely,
Clara Peller
It isn't about dieting or vegetarianism. It is about an overall trend towards greater acceptance/appreciation of more varied and ethnic foods, and a greater demand for vegetables and a variety of sides where once a choice of potato was sufficient.
I wasn't around the DIS for free dining last year, so I don't know if there really were free dining specific menu changes.
As far as what is being added - the same Le Chefs menu that is missing the steak has a new duck entree. From where I sit, that's an improvement that addresses one of the most common complaints about some of the World Showcase restaurants - that the menus are homogenized and Americanized and barely ethnic at all.
Next year they're going to start serving seagull.
I'd really prefer squirrel, if the aim is in park pest control.![]()
I don't doubt that. But the two best sites for menus are STILL unofficial sites. If you look at the Dining page on WDWinfo.com (the DIS home site) or the menus page on allearsnet, you'll see some (granted, not many) of the menus on the former site are almost a year old; and menus on the other site, because they rely mainly on readers to send them menus, can be and are even older than that.illiniowl said:I made my September ADRs in March, and I'm pretty sure the $29 NY strip with sweet potato fries was on every online Spoodles menu I looked at.
Tuesday math lesson, part two. Take notes. This will be on the mid-term.mickey2000 said:Look at 2005 menu below this will show the decline in choices
See Tuesday math lesson part 2, above. Once again, ten items on the 2007 menu vs. ten items on the 2005 menu does not indicate any decline. Seven of the ten items are basically the same as they were, although some have slightly different preparations. In fact, four of the seven prices on those items are priced exactly the same as they were two years ago (and, physics - a seven ounce filet in 2005 has to be a seven ounce filet in 2007 - it can't be 'shrunk' for budgeting purposes, at least not without changing the description on the menu; ditto for a 14 ounce strip steak).mickey2000 said:Compare the 2005 & 2007 menus for Le Cellier its obvious about the decline
And the funny thing is, if that person wants a plain steak while the rest of their party enjoys Mexican food, the Disney Chefs will do their best to accommodate the Guest's request. I mean, a plain steak? Yeah, they can do that (sorry, there was just an A-1 Steak Sauce commercial on TV - that's a take-off on the tag linemarivaid said:That reminds me of a thread I was reading recently about San Angel and someone was wondering why San Angel didn't serve plain steak. Well gee, maybe because it's a Mexican restaurant?????
And, no luck convincing those posters that $55 menu-worth of food for $37.99 is not costing Disney anywhere near $37.99?marivaid said:Actually I posted something like that in a thread a few months back. The consensus was that while a guest on DDP getting $55 worth of food for $37.99 represents a huge loss for Disney,
But at least 'our side' can rest easy in the knowledge that we're rightAmy&Dan said:In the end this is an old arguement that CAN NEVER BE WON (by either side).
Well, since you use those two specific foods, you're NOT talking about a Disney-owned restaurant. You're very obviously refering to Wolfgang Puck's Cafe which is owned by the Levy Group and which contracts with Disney and which makes its OWN decisions regarding its menu. And nobody except you is talking about being "trendy". Where did that come from? And in the 'person will only eat one steak' example, it's up to the entire group to choose a restaurant where each person in the group will be able to eat. Period. It's got nothing to do with ethnic or trendy. It's solely consideration and common sense. As for the focus on ethnic dining - aside from that being the wrong terminology (French, Italian, English, etc, are not ethicities, they're nationalities) that's what Epcot restaurants primarily ARE. They're an opportunity to sample the cuisine of other countries.wen8jr said:We were talking about different WDW resturants changing their menus, previously having steak and now don't, previously having crab cakes and now don't....they shouldn't knock someone else wanting what they like too and having the right to vent because something that was on the menu is now not on the menu and thus changes their plans because someone in their party simply will not eat anything but a steak given all the other choices are seafood, pasta, duck or something unidentified offered at a particular resturant.
I have to ask. Why would you vacation in a place with such a wide variety of dining choices and eat exactly what you eat at home?And if all else fails and Boatrights change their menu before we get there we like a lot of American food; pizza, cheesesteaks, burgers and fried chicken
It seems like there are more and more posts of people talking about changing their ADR's due to menu changes. Many of the restaurants are doing away with the steaks and chicken/pasta items. I think this is weird b/c these are favorite items for a lot of people. I have already had to change WCC since they no longer have the NY strip or nachos and WPC since they no longer have the wolf steak or the crab cakes. What gives?If it is about saving money w/ the DDP being so popular, than I would rather them leave the steaks on the menu and just exclude them from the DDP. I would rather pay OP then not have one at all.
![]()
I hate to bring facts into the middle of a good argument, but demand for beef is up 20% since 1998. Just because you (not talking to anyone in particular here) are eating healthier and cutting down on the red meat doesn't make it a trend.
Well, since you use those two specific foods, you're NOT talking about a Disney-owned restaurant. You're very obviously refering to Wolfgang Puck's Cafe which is owned by the Levy Group and which contracts with Disney and which makes its OWN decisions regarding its menu. And nobody except you is talking about being "trendy". Where did that come from? And in the 'person will only eat one steak' example, it's up to the entire group to choose a restaurant where each person in the group will be able to eat. Period. It's got nothing to do with ethnic or trendy. It's solely consideration and common sense. As for the focus on ethnic dining - aside from that being the wrong terminology (French, Italian, English, etc, are not ethicities, they're nationalities) that's what Epcot restaurants primarily ARE. They're an opportunity to sample the cuisine of other countries.
I have to ask. Why would you vacation in a place with such a wide variety of dining choices and eat exactly what you eat at home?
I have to ask. Why would you vacation in a place with such a wide variety of dining choices and eat exactly what you eat at home?
Great Question !!!! Will you be my friend??
![]()
At least you have the internet, and you now know before you get there that you will need to go somewhere other than Puck's Cafe to get a steak.
And this is a little OT but it's a minor pet peeve of mine. Anyone who says anything is not 100% hunky dory at WDW gets labeled a complainer, is criticized for getting "emotional" over something so trivial, and is told to "get over it" and "you'll still love your vacation," etc. This is a WDW board, for Pete's sake. It's ALL trivial. The fact that someone merely posts a message to a message board about a topic doesn't by any means signify that that person is "emotional" about that topic. So the "get over it" advice is presumptuous (in addition to being condescending -- if it was your ox being gored, how would you feel if I told you "it's not a big deal" or words to that effect). But given that this is a message board (albeit one devoted to a trivial subject in the grand scheme of life), can we not let people post messages questioning the way things are at WDW, or maybe venting a little bit, without immediately giving it a pejorative label or trying to brush it away with dismissive comments? The OP felt she had to write back and defend herself against complaints that she's a knee-jerk complainer. Well, there's just as much knee-jerking going on on the other side, when people pile all over each other to point out "this is no big deal, it happens all the time, deal with it," etc. whenever someone dares to suggest that a change might not have been implemented with the guest's welfare solely in mind.
Back on topic...This is just classic. That's all I have to say.
One more plus is that the changes they are making will ensure you trendy ethnical types who sneer at American food won't have to rub elbows with this Americanized lady.....
OK teacher, you need to take a break with your math lessons and learn to read - in particular the post I quoted which mentioned trends and ethnics, in which I was REFERRING TO....
Thank you very much for the lesson tonight oh great teacher.I think I need to send my last English teacher your way.