Squirlz
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Oct 31, 2000
- Messages
- 7,137
I spoke too soon. While Outsourced was doing very well last year, since returning from the holiday hiatus, it's done very poorly.
You mean the one time it's been on since then?

I spoke too soon. While Outsourced was doing very well last year, since returning from the holiday hiatus, it's done very poorly.

You mean the one time it's been on since then?![]()
The best comedy that no one is watching is Community. I am so afraid its going to be canceled.
!) Oh yeah, don't forget Diff'rent Strokes, and Mr Belvidere! Classics! Say what you want about the lowest common denominator, but sometimes funny tv is just that -- fun and funny. And that's all I'm looking for some days.More to the point, we need more comedies that are not all about sex. With a 6th grader in the house there is very little TV that we can watch because of all the sex and I am *not* a prude.
The target market for Glee is adults, 18-49 years old.Glee is one I stopped watching b/c I couldn't take the content, adults playing kids who were completely oversexualized for the target market of that show (i.e. 11 year old girls)
{snip}
Will the show get even edgier? Executive producer Brad Falchuk says no.
"That hot tub scene, and the Madonna episode that's as edgy as it's gonna get," promises Falchuk, who created the show along with Ryan Murphy.
Falchuk says he came into "Glee" wanting to create something that his sister-in-law in Syracuse, N.Y., could watch with her 14-year-old daughter together "and not feel uncool."
"But we didn't know 9-year-olds would like it so much," he acknowledges. "We didn't know the geriatric set would like it so much, either. I wish we knew how we did it."
Falchuk says the show hasn't gotten any angry calls or letters about its content. The Parents Television Council, though, recommends the show only for viewers above 16.
Falchuk says it's been tempting to get edgier, but the producers keep parents in mind.
"We've had moments in script meetings where we say, 'That's really funny, but you know what? That's more than we told people we'd give them,'" he says.
The bottom line, he says: "We want to give people something safe they can watch with their kids. Enjoy it! We have your back."

Don't really care for Parks and Rec, I watched it the first few times but didn't really think it was all that funny.
Is 'Glee' too racy for its tween target audience?
http://www.thereporteronline.com/articles/2010/05/21/life/srv0000008322967.txt?viewmode=fullstory

I just googled "Glee target audience" and that's one of the links that came up. I posted it because I thought the quote from the Executive Producer was interesting and indicates that the producers of the show feel the target audience may be younger than Bicker believes it to be.
This struck me as funny that the article you pulled comes from a small town newspaper that is near my house, and you're in Wisconsin.
to "The (Dis)torter" (as the Reporter is called in these parts) for making it to the DIS!

ATAS doesn't draw a distinction, so it is a matter of the context of the discussion. The distinctions vary, but from what I've seen, when people refer to a sitcom they're talking about a show focused just on presenting humorous circumstances, within a specific context (the "situation"), where the characters serve the humor, even if it means putting continuity and character development into the back seat. A character-driven comedy, by contrast, will sacrifice humor, at times, just to serve character development.Bicker, can you clear up the difference between a sitcom and a character-driven comedy?
The Simpsons is actually a great example of a sitcom, because they often totally change the world to fit the specific humor they're trying to project. So "world remaining unchanged" is not the metric I see used; rather it is a matter of "Is there character-development integrity? Yes/No"I thought maybe it was that the sitcom "world" remains largely unchanged from week to week (a la Simpsons) but that character-driven somehow shows story progression (a la HIMYM).
Indeed, but Friends and Seinfeld are a bit different and demonstrate something else: It's not either/or. It's a spectrum. The Simpsons is the ultimate sitcom: 100% sitcom; practically 0% character development. Seinfeld isn't that different from The Simpsons. Friends, however, did have very significant character development over time. So it wasn't 100% sitcom. Pick a number... 70% sitcom? 30% sitcom? Somewhere in there.But even the storylines of Friends and Seinfeld had arcs from show to show, and those are definitely sitcoms, so I guess that's not true...