VampHeartless
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Feb 25, 2004
- Messages
- 940
I've being doing some research online about some very mafia-style tactics the US Army is using to "force" soldiers into staying in the military. Basically the scam works with soldiers who serve 2-3 years tours overseas, and have their tours ending before they get out of the army. I'll use my personal example.
I am scheduled to leave England in April of 2006, and finish my eight years of military service in July of 2006. Prior to the war in Iraq, a soldier's tour would be automatically extended the three months needed, so that I would stay in England until I left active duty. My S1 (kind of like secretaries for the army), submitted the paperwork to do this. The US Army comes back and says...I have assignment orders to Ft. Gordon, where I will immediatly deploy to Iraq, in June. One month before I get out. It turns out, as I am a career soldier, I now have three options:
a) Reenlist to meet the time needed to fulfill a two year tour in Georgia, where I would deploy to Iraq.
b) Sign a Declination statement, which is basically a deragatory flag, saying that I refuse to reenlist, that bars me from promotion, reenlistment, selection for any military schooling, or education assistance.
c) Do nothing. If the army insisted I PCS in June, to Georgia, I would be forced to deploy to Iraq my last month in the US Army, then placed on stop loss, where I would be indefinetely held in the military against my will until I am no longer deemed mission essential. This is only possible as long as we are in a time of war; as I have already finished my 4 years inactive reserve.
Now, here's the even worst part. In my research I am finding TONS of cases of troops deployed in Iraq, trying to get out, who are first termers. A first termer is not eligible for option b, sigining a dec statement (option b is only for career soldiers like myself). The recruiters and 1SG's there are telling these young soldiers that they HAVE to reenlist, and that they have no choice in the matter. I've spoken to JAG, and this is completely untrue, but the army continues to use it as a "tactic", because these young soldier's don't know any better!!!
I know it's hard to comprehend...but when you're in an infantry unit, in the desert...your 1SG's word is gold. He is a 30+ year served, wise, experienced sage who is your best mentor. He is never wrong, about anything, in the eyes of a young soldiers. So, if a 1SG tells a private he has to reenlist, because it's the law, the private believes him, because he doesn't know any better, and he doesn't have access to the resources he needs to understand army reenlistment/enlisted management policies. Basically, these young soldiers are duped by older, more experienced soldiers, because the army is having manpower issues.
I've also seen the army try to force someone to reenlist because the army paid to move their spouse overseas, but accidentally gave a soldier a three year tour, instead of a two year tour. The solider was told he either had to reenlist, or the army would ship his wife back home, and make him pay for the time she spent with him overseas that the army paid for.
Last year, the US Army recruiting command nationwide had to shut down for an entire day, because of ethical issues between recruiters and recruitees. The army is the only service that seems to have trouble keeping people within in it's ranks...that has to resort to shady, mob style recruiting tactics to meet their goals. I'm continuing my research, but I wanted to let people here know, since I know so many DIS'ers have friends and family members serving overseas. I'm lucking enough to have a congressman from my state who sits on the military ethical oversight committee. I'm hoping this will grab their attention, once I leave the military in July.
I am scheduled to leave England in April of 2006, and finish my eight years of military service in July of 2006. Prior to the war in Iraq, a soldier's tour would be automatically extended the three months needed, so that I would stay in England until I left active duty. My S1 (kind of like secretaries for the army), submitted the paperwork to do this. The US Army comes back and says...I have assignment orders to Ft. Gordon, where I will immediatly deploy to Iraq, in June. One month before I get out. It turns out, as I am a career soldier, I now have three options:
a) Reenlist to meet the time needed to fulfill a two year tour in Georgia, where I would deploy to Iraq.
b) Sign a Declination statement, which is basically a deragatory flag, saying that I refuse to reenlist, that bars me from promotion, reenlistment, selection for any military schooling, or education assistance.
c) Do nothing. If the army insisted I PCS in June, to Georgia, I would be forced to deploy to Iraq my last month in the US Army, then placed on stop loss, where I would be indefinetely held in the military against my will until I am no longer deemed mission essential. This is only possible as long as we are in a time of war; as I have already finished my 4 years inactive reserve.
Now, here's the even worst part. In my research I am finding TONS of cases of troops deployed in Iraq, trying to get out, who are first termers. A first termer is not eligible for option b, sigining a dec statement (option b is only for career soldiers like myself). The recruiters and 1SG's there are telling these young soldiers that they HAVE to reenlist, and that they have no choice in the matter. I've spoken to JAG, and this is completely untrue, but the army continues to use it as a "tactic", because these young soldier's don't know any better!!!
I know it's hard to comprehend...but when you're in an infantry unit, in the desert...your 1SG's word is gold. He is a 30+ year served, wise, experienced sage who is your best mentor. He is never wrong, about anything, in the eyes of a young soldiers. So, if a 1SG tells a private he has to reenlist, because it's the law, the private believes him, because he doesn't know any better, and he doesn't have access to the resources he needs to understand army reenlistment/enlisted management policies. Basically, these young soldiers are duped by older, more experienced soldiers, because the army is having manpower issues.
I've also seen the army try to force someone to reenlist because the army paid to move their spouse overseas, but accidentally gave a soldier a three year tour, instead of a two year tour. The solider was told he either had to reenlist, or the army would ship his wife back home, and make him pay for the time she spent with him overseas that the army paid for.
Last year, the US Army recruiting command nationwide had to shut down for an entire day, because of ethical issues between recruiters and recruitees. The army is the only service that seems to have trouble keeping people within in it's ranks...that has to resort to shady, mob style recruiting tactics to meet their goals. I'm continuing my research, but I wanted to let people here know, since I know so many DIS'ers have friends and family members serving overseas. I'm lucking enough to have a congressman from my state who sits on the military ethical oversight committee. I'm hoping this will grab their attention, once I leave the military in July.