While the opening date of the resort is one factor, another would be the projected sales track for each property.
Since BLT is a much larger resort DVC could, in effect, use the points from unsold units at the time of opening to subsidize that first year's points for members. In the case of VGC, I suspect DVC projected that the resort would be much closer to sold-out (if not completely gone) by opening day. Thus there would have been little-to-no unsold points to help pad the accounts of early buyers.
Even though the resort is opening sooner than expected and sales are apparently quite slow, it probably doesn't matter since the first point allocation is listed in the contract. My contract says point start February 2010, so that's what DVC is obligated to give me.
I don't believe there was any duplicity on DVC's part--they were simply working from projections available when sales began 6 months ago.
Since BLT is a much larger resort DVC could, in effect, use the points from unsold units at the time of opening to subsidize that first year's points for members. In the case of VGC, I suspect DVC projected that the resort would be much closer to sold-out (if not completely gone) by opening day. Thus there would have been little-to-no unsold points to help pad the accounts of early buyers.
Even though the resort is opening sooner than expected and sales are apparently quite slow, it probably doesn't matter since the first point allocation is listed in the contract. My contract says point start February 2010, so that's what DVC is obligated to give me.
I don't believe there was any duplicity on DVC's part--they were simply working from projections available when sales began 6 months ago.