OK!
<font color=purple>Dreams in <img src=http://photo
- Joined
- Jan 15, 2005
- Messages
- 7,311
Wait the search works? since when?
Lol, that was my exact response as well.

Wait the search works? since when?
My only issue is when I start a thread, and then a while later, a more "popular" poster starts a thread about the same thing, and suddenly my thread becomes a ghost town. It's like high school all over again. Has happened to me three times this year so far.
The search does work now but for many, MANY years did not. I think a lot of us just assumed it was still not operational.
There are other boards on the DIS where I really pity the poor soul who asked a question that comes up frequently. A lot of posters feel required to open the thread and chastise the OP instead of just skipping it since it annoys them. I just don't get that. Either answer the question kindly or ignore the question.![]()
The search does work now but for many, MANY years did not. I think a lot of us just assumed it was still not operational.
There are other boards on the DIS where I really pity the poor soul who asked a question that comes up frequently. A lot of posters feel required to open the thread and chastise the OP instead of just skipping it since it annoys them. I just don't get that. Either answer the question kindly or ignore the question.![]()
Wait, you're complaining because people want to chit chat on a discussion board?![]()
There have been a lot of threads like this. Did you search to see if you could jump on to an existing one.![]()
My only issue is when I start a thread, and then a while later, a more "popular" poster starts a thread about the same thing, and suddenly my thread becomes a ghost town. It's like high school all over again. Has happened to me three times this year so far.
Wait? There are more popular people than YOU, Jennasis????![]()
oh bumping a 3 year old thread is ridiculous but when there are on page 2-3, you think people could look. It isn't that hard.
and is it me? But it takes a ton of restraint for me not to answer the "Has anyone ever shopped at Aldi" type threads with "no, no one has ever shopped there."
I'm horrible.
My only issue is when I start a thread, and then a while later, a more "popular" poster starts a thread about the same thing, and suddenly my thread becomes a ghost town. It's like high school all over again. Has happened to me three times this year so far.
I like to see new opinions and fresh perspectives on repeat topics. I am bothered by the oppostite issue--it bugs me when people DO search and then bump a thread from years ago without bothering to post that they are ressurecting a long dead thread. I tend to be lazy and not read post dates and then I do not realize the situation until a while has passed (if ever). I wish those who bring back old threads would start off by posting that they are doing so, it saves me the hassle of reading those pesky dates myself![]()
Well, sure - but how many new opinions and fresh perspectives can there BE regarding "Has anyone ever shopped at Aldi's?"?NHDisneyLover said:I like to see new opinions and fresh perspectives on repeat topics
On a lot of the technology boards I visit you can't open a new thread if there already is one on the topic. The mods will close the new thread and point your post at the old thread. This is the best way to keep all information about a topic in one place. If a problem already has a solution there is no need to rehash it.
This of course isn't the same for an opinion thread.
On a lot of the technology boards I visit you can't open a new thread if there already is one on the topic. The mods will close the new thread and point your post at the old thread. This is the best way to keep all information about a topic in one place. If a problem already has a solution there is no need to rehash it.
This of course isn't the same for an opinion thread.
I used to participate on a pay for use TV board and they were INSANE about duplicate threads. There were daily "chat" type threads but you were seriously flamed if you started a new thread that was even remotely close to another one started in the last week or so.
I think the same thing when I see those!But it takes a ton of restraint for me not to answer the "Has anyone ever shopped at Aldi" type threads with "no, no one has ever shopped there."
I'm horrible.
But that would be a very different type of board than the DIS.On a lot of the technology boards I visit you can't open a new thread if there already is one on the topic. The mods will close the new thread and point your post at the old thread. This is the best way to keep all information about a topic in one place. If a problem already has a solution there is no need to rehash it.
This of course isn't the same for an opinion thread.
Well, sure - but how many new opinions and fresh perspectives can there BE regarding "Has anyone ever shopped at Aldi's?"?![]()
But that would be a very different type of board than the DIS.
Well, actuallyI only went in ALDI twice in the USA and absolutely hated it both times. I twas filfthy and the stock was very low quality. It was also in a bad part of town (maybe there are better ones in other place). Here in Germany I love ALDI. They are always in good parts of town. They are clean and they have the best quality chicken and turkey of any normal gorcery store in the area (the butcher is better). SO, my opinion of ALDI has changed, significantly. I admit the phrasing is a bit annoying and if taken literally the only answer is "yes, people have shopped there" but we all know that is not what the poster intends to ask.