When did being deliberately insulting and rude become amusing? I guess if you like that sort of humor their are comics that you can pay to go and see for it, but to serve that sort of thing up at a game seems pretty low and disgusting. The majority of the people at the game seemed to find it pretty low too, judging by the boos.
I'm going to play devil's advocate for a bit.
It's all about context. Or maybe venue. The obvious places for being insulting and rude are at celebrity roasts and in parodies. On the flip side, when did it become ok for a group of guys to grab someone, pull him down to the ground, and pile on top? Or try to steal something right out of his hands? Obviously the things that football players do on the field would get them ejected from a soccer match and perhaps arrested if done to a stranger on the street. It's all about context.
What about the rude fans who yell insulting things at other players or even the officials? Is it ok to yell that the ump is blind? (Do people still do that? I've been to one sporting event in the last 30 years or so.) Is there a difference between the things irate fans yell and what the Stanford band did? Are they worse or better than the rude fans? Or do we just have a higher standard because they're representing their school and are taking center stage? What the Stanford band did surely isn't as bad as various fan riots that have taken place over the years (though perhaps the
alleged involvement of the Univ. of Toronto's band in disrupting the opening of a new subway comes close).
It's unfortunate for the Standford band that they're not in the Ivies. While the Ivy League bands have been known to use bad judgment from time to time, merely insulting the other school is expected and accepted; they wouldn't have been criticized there (though it's ironic that the one Ivy with an agricultural school is the one with a serious marching band). Big school bands may be trying to get on the Boston Pops. Harvard band members are trying for the Harvard (or National) Lampoon. Sure, they've stepped over the line at times. They're college kids with a college age sense of humor. But they can pull it off well, too. When
West Point visited Yale, some 30 years ago, after the Yale band performed, Army Spokesman Maj. Cooney said "I saw nothing wrong with it. I was even laughing myself. They poked fun at our profession [the military], but they did it tastefully.''
I don't have an answer for Stanford. Their academics are Ivy League quality, but their football is Pac-12. There's nothing wrong in scrambling to formation instead of marching. There's nothing wrong with a humorous show instead of precision marching or musical quality. And,
within reason, there shouldn't be anything wrong with poking fun at the other team, if it's done tastefully. I don't know the details of what they did this year - perhaps it was over the line, but that's not clear in the reports I'm reading. Part of me says that football in general is taken way too seriously, and there's nothing wrong with trying to lighten up the sport. But the Stanford band doesn't seem to be in a situation where they can make any progress at that.