Toad_Passenger
Wild Ride Dreamer
- Joined
- Feb 17, 2009
- Messages
- 3,014
Nothing wrong with that theory. In fact, I like it. However the other side of the coin is, in 1918 we didn't have flu vaccines to drive the mutation of different strains of the virus. Also, an outbreak would be more likely to be contained in a quarantined area. We didn't pile into subways like sardines everday, come in contact with hundreds if not thousands of people on a daily basis, or hop onto planes and transports our local germs all over the face of the globe. So there are benefits and drawbacks when comparing the two situations.
It is an interesting debate. A virus can only live so long as it is getting passed around which is why it mutates. If it is too strong and kills its host too fast the virus will not survive. Some scientists are postulating that's why we have deaths in Mexico, but more "mild" cases in the USA, that the virus mutated to allow itself to be more easily passed, but in doing so weakened itself drastically. I've learned so much about bio-science in the last week it makes me want to go back to college (or is it the parties that make me want to go back?)