I'm still trying to wrap my mind around a city that has suburbs without any public transportation. My.mind.is.blown.
I really don't understand this at all. It's not uncommon. It's pretty much the norm around here. Cities have buses or bigger cities have subways. Suburbs and rural areas don't have any public transportation. I live in a town that's 18 square miles, population about 14,000. About 5 miles outside of a good-sized city. There is no public transportation. None. Not making this up!
Then it's semantics. Suburbs are not part of a city. They're separate towns. It's the small towns around a larger city.
I think WE understand/can wrap our brains around the fact that YOUR environment differs from ours in various ways, but you seem to be having an awful lot of trouble grasping that the entire world doesn't live exactly as you do. In some cases, they don't even want to. If you cannot travel to broaden your horizons, perhaps viewing some documentaries or watching The Travel Channel might be of benefit.Not making this up either! That is not the norm here.Suburbs are part of the city. City taxes collected by property taxes maintain our public transit system.
I think WE understand/can wrap our brains around the fact that YOUR environment differs from ours in various ways, but you seem to be having an awful lot of trouble grasping that the entire world doesn't live exactly as you do. In some cases, they don't even want to. If you cannot travel to broaden your horizons, perhaps viewing some documentaries or watching The Travel Channel might be of benefit.
It just surprised me (didn't blow.my.mind) that your mind was blown over the fact that not everyone has a transportation system exactly like yours. It just seemed like something most people would be aware of.No need to be rude. I just thought the article I posted was interesting. Sorry you didn't think so. They make documentaries on public transit in American suburbs? Sounds riveting.
And yes I have ridden public transit in many large American cities. Never realized it didn't extend to the suburbs and didn't realize you were an expert on all things transit.
I was the one who brought up the SAHM WOHM thing on the other thread, in extreme caution that I made sure that I phrased every word carefully so as not to insult or bring judgement on anyone! Every single thing I said was based on my own experiences, and I totally understand how different circumstances bring about different lifestyle choices. Frankly, being the mom at all is never the most "fun" job most of the time, no matter how we do it!
.
It is one of the great failings of the US. Makes it really hard on lower income people; moving is too expensive and getting a car can be too expensive, so then what?I'm still trying to wrap my mind around a city that has suburbs without any public transportation. My.mind.is.blown.
Absolutely CdnCarrie, this is not your doing at all---your comments were honest and respectful, IMO. The issue was specifically being told that those who are not working for pay should call themselves unemployed (which as others say, does not really define it and is full of negative connotations). I think most people are not interested in one upping one another or saying that being an at home parent or spouse is better or worse than being a working one---but it is easy to get defensive when what you do is totally dismissed and treated by as without value, as insisting it be called "unemployed" indicates.It is one of the great failings of the US. Makes it really hard on lower income people; moving is too expensive and getting a car can be too expensive, so then what?
More and more places are working on adding better public transit though! It is slow progress, but we'Re getting there.
Agreed. Not really necessary to say. But still both are true.Saying a stay at home parent is unemployed makes the same sense as saying a 5 year old is unmarried.
When you hire someone to do those jobs, you have to pay for it. If a family opts to take care of these tasks themselves there is a substantial cost savings.I don't think cooking dinner, cleaning the house and carting the kids around after school is considered work. It's simply called parenting which SAHM and working moms do alike. Most people aren't going to touch this thread. It's too controversial.
I don't say I am a working person. I'm just not unemployed either (ok, technically if by that you mean does not work for pay, but that is NOT how it is normally used--so insisting someone should use it when they are not working is rude and dismissive, IMO).I don't think cooking dinner, cleaning the house and carting the kids around after school is considered work. It's simply called parenting which SAHM and working moms do alike. Most people aren't going to touch this thread. It's too controversial.
I'm still trying to wrap my mind around a city that has suburbs without any public transportation. My.mind.is.blown.