That was my thought but what worries me is that even if it isn’t, it shows me that more restrictions to changing trips may not work like people think they will.
IF and that’s a BIG IF, the intention was to curb walkers then you would have thought that whatever they wanted to implement was consistent to all users. That is definitely not the case here. Some are impacted others aren’t.
But I’ll give you, since it’s SEEMS to only impact club level and value rooms at least for AKV and not resort view rooms, then it could be something done on purpose. On the other hand, I can book value rooms with my other membership and no issues here at all whatsoever.
From reading this thread the issue seems to be twofold, 1st is the issue that I experience, the modification module at the website does not see the current points already used for a reservation, thus you can’t make modifications unless you borrow or have points left to use. 2nd some users have 0 points left in their contracts, even though they should have some left in either current or future UY.
I don’t know if both issues are impacting both direct and resale, my AKV contract is resale.
I tend to believe that the way my account is setup is sort of unique as I’m international and I can get access to MMB, I can see and do all (at least I think I can) similar to those living in the U.S. If you do system updates and only intend to update some records(members) but not others then my setup is definitely one of those that could cause headaches. I assume that I’m not the only one with a unique setup other members will have it too but in their own way.
That’s also why I don’t understand why more regression testing isn’t done - before releasing updates into the wild. I know I know Disney is probably getting what they paid for and nothing more.
Heck maybe I should suggest that to my manager, we can cut time to market in the financial sector but more than half - no testing, just development and implementation
