queenofhartz
DIS Veteran
- Joined
- Aug 15, 2007
- Messages
- 526
Really hard to compare these two. One question - how long do you have to spend (I apologize if that's been asked already; I did not read the entire thread.)? If you have a week or more, then I vote London - by a landslide.
If you have less than a week, I think you'll find WDW more enjoyable and "doable." I would not recommend trying to cram London into less than 7 days if it's your first trip.
We went to London in 2005 and stayed for one week (8 days/7 nights). One week was barely enough time, because we LOVED IT SO MUCH. Also, there are some awesome flats that you rent for very reasonable prices (I would definitely look into flat rentals -google vacation flats London or holiday flats London). Five people went in our group and stayed in a 2 bedroom flat right on the River Thames. It was $2500 for the week (granted, this was back in 2005, but the same place is still available today for $2800/week) Tower Bridge was right outside of our window - literally. Our place wasn't fancy, but it was clean, and it felt like London. We also really got to know our neighborhood and felt like locals - we spent time in our local (pub) and at our neighborhood fish and chips stand (best ever!). Most of all, I really enjoyed experiencing the culture of an entirely different country. They might speak a similar language, but it's a totally different (and beautiful) culture (even the language is pretty different - I love it!).
I agree with other posters - it can be expensive. But, like most cities, you can do this for as expensive as you want, or you can keep it within a reasonable budget. Renting the flat (as opposed to staying in a hotel) helped us save A LOT of $$. We also didn't eat in a whole lot of tourist areas. Eating right next to the Tower of London can be more expensive than going back to your neighborhood and getting some fish and chips for $8 per person. You just have to be willing to get off the beaten path a little. We had some excellent meals, and I can't say they were more expensive than restaurants in Atlanta. We also ate breakfast and some dinners in our flat.
I love Disneyworld, but London is a city - an extremely old city with a rich and fascinating history, engaging culture, lovely people, and what feels like an infinite amount of things to do and see. This isn't meant as a put down, but Disneyworld is a theme park, and London is an authentic historical city. There's just no comparison.
Have fun whatever you choose.
If you have less than a week, I think you'll find WDW more enjoyable and "doable." I would not recommend trying to cram London into less than 7 days if it's your first trip.
We went to London in 2005 and stayed for one week (8 days/7 nights). One week was barely enough time, because we LOVED IT SO MUCH. Also, there are some awesome flats that you rent for very reasonable prices (I would definitely look into flat rentals -google vacation flats London or holiday flats London). Five people went in our group and stayed in a 2 bedroom flat right on the River Thames. It was $2500 for the week (granted, this was back in 2005, but the same place is still available today for $2800/week) Tower Bridge was right outside of our window - literally. Our place wasn't fancy, but it was clean, and it felt like London. We also really got to know our neighborhood and felt like locals - we spent time in our local (pub) and at our neighborhood fish and chips stand (best ever!). Most of all, I really enjoyed experiencing the culture of an entirely different country. They might speak a similar language, but it's a totally different (and beautiful) culture (even the language is pretty different - I love it!).
I agree with other posters - it can be expensive. But, like most cities, you can do this for as expensive as you want, or you can keep it within a reasonable budget. Renting the flat (as opposed to staying in a hotel) helped us save A LOT of $$. We also didn't eat in a whole lot of tourist areas. Eating right next to the Tower of London can be more expensive than going back to your neighborhood and getting some fish and chips for $8 per person. You just have to be willing to get off the beaten path a little. We had some excellent meals, and I can't say they were more expensive than restaurants in Atlanta. We also ate breakfast and some dinners in our flat.
I love Disneyworld, but London is a city - an extremely old city with a rich and fascinating history, engaging culture, lovely people, and what feels like an infinite amount of things to do and see. This isn't meant as a put down, but Disneyworld is a theme park, and London is an authentic historical city. There's just no comparison.
Have fun whatever you choose.

there were times I have tried to get "out". 