POSSIBLE DEBATE: Should parents hit their children in public??

HB, you are of course right! It is just fun to get into a rowdy discussion every once in awhile. I really enjoy hearing the opinions of others! There are a bunch of well informed and vocal folks on here!

Have a good day!

Michelle

I areally am interested if anyone has any of the info that I mentioned. I have been out of the field for a few years, but wil always be interested!
 
CRSNDSNY , with the greatest respect, everything you quote from those lauded psychologists about corporal punishment can be just as relevent to removal of privilages or any other punishment. Taking a kids toys away doesn't remove the desire from them to behave in a certain fashion, it just ups the stakes in the "risk" of the "risk and reward" calculation. I can guarantee that "grounding" my kids causes plenty of resentment and "often elicits undesirable emotional responses " .

As far as
punishment maylead to aggression. When punishment produces pain, it evokes emotional arousal in an individual - arousal that may result in anger an aggression.
I would agree that punishment can lead to agression, but my experience has shown me that my exwife tends to punish the kids with "time outs" and lack of privilages, but her non corporal options have left her nursing a fat lip from my 12 Y old who wasn't happy with her punishment on more than one occassion.

From your finishing line of "Punishment does not illustrate the correct behaviour" I have to conclude you do not think that any punishment is warrented for any behaviour, after all a "time out" does not illustrate a "correct behaviour" nor does the (arguable) theft/confiscation of a childs toys for a length of time. We all are products of "conditioning" for any society to flourish there needs to be rules of what is and what is not accepted behaviour, without laying down those basic rules of society ( and parents are the front line of that conditioning) we will fall into anarchy. Benevolent behaviour in society is not something that is hardwired into our brains, indeed survival of the fittest has hardwired a predisposition to selfish and at time malevolent behaviour into us. It is something that is a learned or "conditioned" behaviour, we learn (at a young age) that we must consider the effects of our actions on those around us, at times that can be done vocally, at times it needs some form of punishment to underline an antisocial behaviour. There are some kids/people that will never be told that they have to play nice, they need to understand that if they don't play nice it costs them. That's human nature and to try and deny it is to live in a fantasy world.

I would very much agree with "meandtheguys" I don't think that childrens behaviour has improved with the "new approach" to dealing with dicipline and IMHO my experience in Britain leads me to believe our children are behaving more violently both to their elders and their contemporaries and to a large degree this is because they are so used to getting their own way and do not fear the consiquences of their selfish actions.

All kids are different and respond to different "punishments" in different ways, My DG Jana knows that at home if she spanks her son he just gets more wound up and is likely to repeat the punishable offence as a challange to her. In public on the rare occasions he is doing something that puts him in danger and he ignores verbal warnings to cease ( time out is obviously not an option when in public) a (prefably loud) sharp smack on the backside will make him stop the behaviour and he'll sheepishly tow the line and stop the behaviour. It's not an option she likes using, but if it stops him running in the road, playing with matches, running away in the mall or generally putting himself in an unacceptable risk then it's an option that she ( or any other parent) should be able to use in order to regain control of his actions. At home he simply HATES being in time out and being left alone in a room, it's by far a "worse" punishment to him in that circumstance.
 
Originally posted by vernon
CRSNDSNY , with the greatest respect, everything you quote from those lauded psychologists about corporal punishment can be just as relevent to removal of privilages or any other punishment. Taking a kids toys away doesn't remove the desire from them to behave in a certain fashion, it just ups the stakes in the "risk" of the "risk and reward" calculation. I can guarantee that "grounding" my kids causes plenty of resentment and "often elicits undesirable emotional responses " .

I think you are confusing negative reinforcement, positive reinforcement, negative punishment and positive punishment. All are very different and illicit different results.
 

one more thing....


Understand that there are clinically speaking two different types of punishment: Punishment I (aka positive punishment) and Punishment II (aka negative punishment). I am not saying that punishment is not effective, but when each type are used appropriately they can be very effective. Positive punishment decreases the strength of a response when it is presented after that response -- it involves the presentation of an aversive stimulus (this would be something like spanking or a failing grade). Negative punishment decreases the strength of a response by the removal of a stimulus -- usually a pleasant one. For example, losing a privilege.

I strongly believe that severe punishment of any kind can lead to psychological harm. Obviously, severe positive punishment can lead to bodily injury, but severe psychological punishment such as extreme embarassment or deflation of one's self-esteem can be equally as harmful. And really, the line between punishment and abuse is so very fuzzy.

Despite the above and as I stated earlier, punishment can be very effective in bringing about a desired behavior change. Obviously you wouldn't want to smack or spank your kid because they were hitting their friend/brother/sister. That's one of my 'favorites' that you often see in public (JUST an example): Little Johnny is smacking Brother Bobby and Mom/Dad says, "Little Johnny, you better stop hitting your brother or you'll get a lickin'." Yeah, that's effective.
 
CRS, just wondering if you are a parent, practioner or an academic. Nothing personal, but most of what you stated just sounds like one of my old psyc. books. I had a lot of opinions before I started practicing what I preached and then bearing three of the little rugrats.
 
--- No offense taken.....my replies do not come from old psyc textbooks or anything like that....I teach at a college and have gathered my knowledge through extensive research, academics, practice, etc.

Before anyone else bothers with a rebuttal of my posts, I'm done with this topic. I said what I wanted to say and respect your opinions. You aren't going to change my mind and I am not trying to change yours.

I'm moving onto another thread.

Thank you.
 
/
I am sorry, I didn't mean to offend at all! I was just wondering where you were coming from. My apologies!

Michelle
 
As a parent we must find the right 'buttons' to push with each child. I could have beaten my now 30 y/o son. It would have made not one bit of difference to him. But, let me show my disappointment by shedding a tear and he went nuts!!! "Please, Mom...don't cry. I'll never do it again. I promise!" And he didn't.

Now, that same dd, now 10, needed new shoes at the age of 5. So, off to the store we went. We found some that we both liked. But, did they have them in her size? No, only one pair that was 2 sizes too small. So, I continued looking. Nope, nothing was good enough at this point with the 'she-devil'. She went ballistic. Screaming, threw herself on the floor....the whole 9 yards. I told her we would leave if she didn't pull herself together. She didn't. Wouldn't walk, just went limp and screamed. Now, this was very unusual behavior from her. But, I picked her up, with her facing away from me since she was kicking me, and carried her out of the store. The younger moms were in shock, one asked why I just didn't buy her what she wanted. But, all the older moms, like me, were just grinning and giving me high fives. When we got to the car "she-devil' says, "I'll be good Mom, can we go back and get the other shoes now?" Yeah, sure, right kid. Nope, we went home. No spanking, hitting or anything. But, she was at an age that I could reason with her.

So many parents are trying to never upset their kids, making sure the kids never get disappointed...well, it just doesn't work. Kids have to learn to deal with those feelings. If not, then what happens when they are 16 and can't get what they want? Yep, real aggresion in many cases. We need to be parents, not buddies, to our kids. If you need a friend...join the Y, otherwise dole out some discipline. Abuse...No, just plain ole discipline. Actions=consequences in real life.
 
Originally posted by CRSNDSNY
Disrespectful. Want your child to learn? Talk to them. Hitting tells them violence is okay.

How well can you talk to a 2-year old? I'm honestly asking - I don't have kids yet, but *most* of the toddlers I've seen don't reason too well.

I don't plan on spanking, but I will keep it as a last resort. My mom spanked us a couple times when we were little. As we got older, she learned the punishments that fit us best - ie, taking my books away! For my little sister, taking away books wouldn't have been a punishment.
 
Well, I don't hit my kids and I have two very well behaved children. My 2 year old is a curious little spitfire and can really test me but how would hitting him truly help? It may break his spirit and make him fear me but I don't want that either. He turns 2 tomorrow and I know he understands what I am saying. He will point to things that are off limits and say No-No. Kids are a heck of a lot smarter than we give them credit for.

When he stays away from things that are off limits, he gets a boat load of positive reinforcement in the form of "Good boy!!!" combined with kisses and hugs. Positive reinforcement can work WONDERS but it isn't as easy. When he makes good choices he gets positive reinforcement. Same goes for my daughter. Occassionally, they receive a large reward for being good. I often receive compliements on how well behaved my kids are...yet I don't hit them.

I would still love to see someone answer my question about why it is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE to hit anyone else in society except our children. Your boss can't hit you for making mistakes. Why is it okay to hit our children? I don't get it. Where is the distinction?
 
Honestly if they are your kids you will discapline them how you see fit within the guidelines of the law they passed a law up here in Canada stating it is legal to smack you children so you can no longer be charged with this. I have seen far to many times a passerby call the police because they were upset by seeing a child spanked and given a talking to for being bad in public. I tisn't your children stay out of thier business so yes spank your kids in public if you feel they deserve it.
 
Originally posted by MosMom
Well, I don't hit my kids and I have two very well behaved children. My 2 year old is a curious little spitfire and can really test me but how would hitting him truly help? It may break his spirit and make him fear me but I don't want that either.

Do you discipline him (other than positive reinforcement)? I mean, like take away his toys or some such? I'm just wondering - I remember when I was a kid it hurt me so much more when Mom said I couldn't read for a couple of hours!

I am just honestly wondering - all I have to compare child discipline to is my cats. ;) For them, simply telling them NO and redirecting their scratching from the couch to the cat trees didn't work. So I started shooting their backsides with a water gun - if they could talk, I'd bet they claim it as spanking. That worked. Now I use positive reinforcement whenever I see them using their cat posts, and I haven't had to even pick up the water gun in a year.
 
Originally posted by MosMom
Well, I don't hit my kids and I have two very well behaved children. My 2 year old is a curious little spitfire and can really test me but how would hitting him truly help? It may break his spirit and make him fear me but I don't want that either. He turns 2 tomorrow and I know he understands what I am saying. He will point to things that are off limits and say No-No. Kids are a heck of a lot smarter than we give them credit for.

When he stays away from things that are off limits, he gets a boat load of positive reinforcement in the form of "Good boy!!!" combined with kisses and hugs. Positive reinforcement can work WONDERS but it isn't as easy. When he makes good choices he gets positive reinforcement. Same goes for my daughter. Occassionally, they receive a large reward for being good. I often receive compliements on how well behaved my kids are...yet I don't hit them.

I would still love to see someone answer my question about why it is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE to hit anyone else in society except our children. Your boss can't hit you for making mistakes. Why is it okay to hit our children? I don't get it. Where is the distinction?

I agree with you. Two year olds can certainly understand. Would you want your two year old to think that it's acceptable to hit others? They'll be giving you a call from pre-school. I'm not sure why parents who don't spank seem to be considered that our kids are running wild and doing whatever they want. Just because I don't spank doesn't mean I don't have a well behaved child. My methods are simply different.

Regarding the fact that it's unacceptable for anyone else to be hit--it hasn't been that long since it was considered just fine for a man to "discipline" his wife.

Hitting humiliates whether it's in public or in private. It's just a bigger person getting their own way through force.
 
Originally posted by MosMom
Well, I don't hit my kids and I have two very well behaved children. My 2 year old is a curious little spitfire and can really test me but how would hitting him truly help? It may break his spirit and make him fear me but I don't want that either. He turns 2 tomorrow and I know he understands what I am saying. He will point to things that are off limits and say No-No. Kids are a heck of a lot smarter than we give them credit for.

Only you can know if spanking is an effective disciplinary tool for your child. It sounds like you don't need to use that one with your children. Lucky you! No one is advocating beating your children for being children and for being curious, but do you seriously think that a swat in the butt to drive home the idea that you don't play with fire or run into the street for a child who doesn't listen any other way is going to break their spirit? Better to let them burn themselves or get hit by a car so they learn to fear fire and cars instead of their parents.

Yes, kids are pretty smart and part of that is that they spend a whole bunch of time testing their limits. If your kids respond to just saying "no-no" once again, you're very lucky. Not all kids respond so well and require a little physical reinforcement to understand the idea that some things they do have negative consequences.
 
Originally posted by NMAmy
Would you want your two year old to think that it's acceptable to hit others? They'll be giving you a call from pre-school.

Are you saying that the only children who hit in school are those who are spanked? Funny, I find it to be the other way around. The kids who have the hitting/biting/pinching issues are the ones who hit/bite/pinch and get told "nono, you can't do that."

An acquaintance of mine has a 2 year old with a biting problem. He bit another friend's kid at a BBQ and was picked up, held in time out for about 3 minutes while daddy told him "it's not nice to bite" and then let him go while nodding his head saying he didn't know what he was going to do with that child. He bit two other kids that afternoon.

My sister bit me ONCE as a kid and got a spanking for it. She doesn't even remember the incident now as an adult but that was the first and last time she ever bit.
 
For my son, I really don't discipline him yet. Aside from redirecting him, he hasn't required anything more. My daughter is nearly 7 and with her, I withhold priviledges but it has been quite some time since I've had to do that. The biggest issue I have with her right now is whining when she can't have her way. I simply don't respond when she is whining. I like to sing Rolling Stones "You can't always get what you want" and that really irritates her too. ;)

I have never read any of the "expert" parenting books but formerly working with dolphins and using positive reinforcement frequently seems to come naturally. When you think about it, you are training your kids. To me, the same basic philosophies apply.
 
Originally posted by Lisa F
Are you saying that the only children who hit in school are those who are spanked? Funny, I find it to be the other way around. The kids who have the hitting/biting/pinching issues are the ones who hit/bite/pinch and get told "nono, you can't do that."

An acquaintance of mine has a 2 year old with a biting problem. He bit another friend's kid at a BBQ and was picked up, held in time out for about 3 minutes while daddy told him "it's not nice to bite" and then let him go while nodding his head saying he didn't know what he was going to do with that child. He bit two other kids that afternoon.

My sister bit me ONCE as a kid and got a spanking for it. She doesn't even remember the incident now as an adult but that was the first and last time she ever bit.

No, I'm not saying that only those children who hit are the ones who are spanked. I don't work in a daycare but I had a child who went to one. I can tell you from experience that she was not spanked and she did not hit other children. How can you tell your child "We don't hit" then turn around and spank them without feeling like a hypocrite?

About the child with the biting problem--if my child had done that I would have had her sit right with me. No playing with the other children if you can't play nicely. Or just leave the party. One ineffective parent does not mean that all who don't spank would behave the same way.

I also bit my sister when I was 3. My mother bit me so hard on my arm that I had the mark for more than a week. Do I remember it as an adult? You betcha. Would I do that to my own child? Just because it happened to me, doesn't mean I want my child to have to go through it.

Here's another question I've been wondering about as I read this thread. For all those who do spank and feel that time outs, etc, are ineffective--would you want your daycare provider to spank your child? How do you feel about corporal punishment in schools?

I really do respect the opinions of everyone who has posted in favor of spanking--I just wanted to present the other view and maybe gain some insight as to why others spank their kids.
 
Originally posted by MosMom
I would still love to see someone answer my question about why it is COMPLETELY UNACCEPTABLE to hit anyone else in society except our children. Your boss can't hit you for making mistakes. Why is it okay to hit our children? I don't get it. Where is the distinction?

I guess I can take a stab at this. The reason boils down to the fact that children are CHILDREN and not LITTLE ADULTS. By the time a child becomes an adult, they had better well realize that every action they have will have consequences. No, they will not get spanked if they make a mistake at their job... instead they may be fired for incompetency and left with a spouse and 2 kids to feed without a job. Some children have difficulty making that connection (and it seems like lately more and more young adults do as well). For those children, a swat on the behind can send a strong, basic message that is not subject to interpretation based on their age and maturity level and ability to understand abstract concepts.

Positive reinforcement is a wonderful tool for working with kids, but without an understanding that if you screw up there are going to be negative consequences, you wind up with an obnoxious teen/young adult who is stunned when they don't get positive reinforcement every step of the way and even more stunned when they have to face negative consequences for their actions. I don't believe that children who grow up understanding that there are negative consequences for poor behavior grow up with their spirit squashed, although a little healthy respect and fear for what an authority figure might do if you screw up is not a bad thing.

Some kids are easy. I was that kind of a kid. If my parents said to me "we are very disappointed in your behavior" it was worse than if they took away any privileges. My sister, on the other hand, was stubborn as all heck and when she was little the only thing she responded to was a spanking. When she got older, privileges were taken away.

I can't speak for others but I'm not saying that every kid needs to be spanked in order to be a good kid or even that MOST kids should be spanked. I'm not saying that every parent who doesn't spank isn't doing their job. I have seen a couple of kids who definitely seem like they could do with a swat now and again, and not for doing normal kid things or being naturally curious, but rather for behaviors that are completely unacceptable (my aforementioned biting example for one thing.)

I'm not saying that positive reinforcement should not be used. In fact, I think positive reinforcement is a great tool to use as long as you don't overuse it to the point where you basically have to bribe your kids to behave. If taking away privileges does the trick and your kid behaves well, wonderful! If putting your kid in a time out works, bravo! I don't mean to sound flippant but you should consider yourself lucky that your kid has the type of personality where these things have meaning to them. I really hope that these methods will work with my own kids someday.

Some kids can't or won't respond well to those kinds of things and for those kids, an alternate form of discipline needs to be used. I don't think parents who use a method by which their child will understand very quickly that what they just did has serious consequences (ie spanking) are bad or abusive parents for it.

Like I said before, a friend of mine was very anti-spanking before she had her first little boy. She can talk to him until she is blue in the face but what stopped him from yanking on the dog's tail was a swat for it. What stopped him from throwing his entire body against the windows in their house when he was having a temper tantrum was a swat for it. She is NOT a bad parent for spanking her child (who, btw, does not have any issues with beating up other kids in preschool). If she had let him pull the dog's tail until the dog turned around and bit him, she would be a bad parent. If she let him throw himself into the windows until he went crashing through, she would be a bad parent. Raising a safe and happy child through methods that work for her does not makes her a good parent.
 
Originally posted by Miss Jasmine
Well when I go to the store I see overly indulged spoiled brats that their parents bend over backwards to make happy. Some of them could use a little swat. :rolleyes:

The parents or the kids? Or both? ;)

Our kids were both spanked when they were younger, and both have survived quite nicely, thank you. There is a huge difference between hitting/beating a child and spanking a child.

If I saw someone hitting (as in closed fist or punching) a child in public, I would bring it to someone's attention. If they were swatting them on the butt, none of my business.

The reason boils down to the fact that children are CHILDREN and not LITTLE ADULTS.

Bingo. And way too many children today are being brought up to believe that they are adults. Huge mistake, IMO.
 












Receive up to $1,000 in Onboard Credit and a Gift Basket!
That’s right — when you book your Disney Cruise with Dreams Unlimited Travel, you’ll receive incredible shipboard credits to spend during your vacation!
CLICK HERE














DIS Facebook DIS youtube DIS Instagram DIS Pinterest

Back
Top