this is what i like about this land, they had a little bit of creative freedom to branch off so to speak, same with Star Wars landNot I but I don't think the upcoming sequels will have much impact on the immediate success of Pandora.
i think Pandora might create a renewed interest in the original movie which will help with the sequels.
Avatar's success was realized in its groundbreaking cinematography/GG/3D. It's commonplace now so the sequels have quite large shoes to fill. Although nostalgia (on a smaller scale than SW) will also drive people to see the movies.
I think after Pandora opens, there'll be an increase in Avatar BD/DVD sales in prep for the sequels.
A small sample, but many people here at work have heard of Pandora via the recent uptick in advertisement. But not many know of 4 sequels being produced.
I still don't see it as a 'destination', an entire reason to visit WDW, unlike say Wizarding World of Harry Potter, as I don't think Avatar has such a cult following.
Although the 2 lands are similar in execution. i,e taking an existing story/movie/book (ala Harry Potter) and movie (Avatar) and replicating it in real life.
The one difference is Pandora is set after the movies, so WDW has more freedom in portrayal and story. Cost-wise, WDW invested almost 3 times as much in Pandora than Universal did for WWHP, for a much smaller franchise.
I hope it works out for them. It looks pretty cool, but is that enough to draw sustaining crowds until SWL is finished?
and to be honest the comparisons to HP are getting old to me. it doesnt have to be HP to be a very successful land. Im thinking it will equal or surpass Carsland in terms of raw attendance. If this land gives DAk a 15-20% bump in attendance i would consider that a success